Learn: A Proof of Concept Seattle Legislative Plain-Text Translator

Previous Legislation
Jun 30 – Aug 4, 2026

Learn•Connect•Engage

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Approving Claims Payment (July 20–24, 2026) and Ratifying Prior Acts

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay various city claims and electronic financial transactions for the week of July 20 through July 24, 2026. Specifically, it authorized payments totaling over $99 million via mechanical warrants, e-payables, and electronic financial transactions (EFT).

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the City of Seattle to pay various claims and financial transactions processed for the week of July 20, 2026, through July 24, 2026. The legislation approves total expenditures across three categories, including mechanical warrants, e-payables, and electronic financial transactions (EFT). Specifically, it appropriates approximately $99.3 million to cover these costs, which include city payroll and general bills.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted August 4, 2026
Legislative journey
Aug 4 City Council Referred
Aug 4 City Council Passed
Aug 6 Mayor Signed
Aug 6 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance to Clarify Council Land Use Decision Processes in Seattle Municipal Code

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Land Use & Zoning
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
petitioners‑and‑appellants represented-by · direct · 90% confidence

This bill removes the ability to appeal certain SEPA decisions, such as Determinations of Nonsignificance and Final Environmental Impact Statements, through the Seattle Hearing Examiner's process.

developers‑and‑builders regulated · procedural · 80% confidence

This bill extends the waiting periods before the City Council can act on legislation following the publication of a DNS, FEIS, or SEIS, while requiring a plain-language summary of environmental reports.

homeowners regulated · procedural · 60% confidence

This bill changes the procedural timelines for Council land use decisions and requires that environmental impact summaries be written in plain language and provided in accessible formats.

license‑and‑permit‑holders regulated · procedural · 60% confidence

This bill modifies the administrative process for land use decisions by extending public comment periods and delaying Council action on certain environmental determinations.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — No
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — No
Maritza Rivera District 4 — No
Debora Juarez District 5 — No
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

Amendments

Member / Body Amendment Date
City Council passed as amended Jul 28, 2026
Land Use and Sustainability Committee pass as amended Jul 15, 2026

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed amending several sections of the Seattle Municipal Code to clarify the procedures and processes the City Council follows when making land use decisions. Its primary goal was to provide clearer guidelines and administrative consistency for how the Council handles these specific regulatory actions.

What The Final Text Does

Council Bill 121215 seeks to streamline and clarify the process for "Type V" land use decisions, such as area-wide rezones and land use code text amendments. The ordinance specifically aims to remove procedural impediments by amending the Seattle Municipal Code and SEPA regulations to ensure land use legislation is considered in a timely manner. A primary focus of the bill is to exempt certain legislative environmental determinations from the administrative appeals process, aligning Seattle's practices with other regional jurisdictions like King County and Bellevue.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by City Clerk
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted July 28, 2026
Legislative journey
May 19 City Council Referred
May 20 Land Use and Sustainability Committee Discussed
Jul 15 Land Use and Sustainability Committee Pass as amended
Jul 28 City Council Passed as amended
Jul 31 Mayor Signed
Jul 31 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

New IT Talent Modernization Classification and Pay Structure Ordinance

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Labor & Workforce Standards
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
employees‑in‑regulated‑sectors employed-by · direct · 90% confidence

This bill establishes a new 10-step grade pay system and a modernized classification structure for City IT positions to ensure compensation is competitive and equitable. These changes replace an outdated 1997 system with standardized roles and pay rates aligned with current market benchmarks.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the creation of a new classification title structure and corresponding pay rates for Information Technology (IT) positions across all City of Seattle departments. This initiative aimed to replace an outdated system with a modernized structure organized by disciplinary domain and responsibility levels to ensure more competitive and equitable compensation.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance establishes a modernized classification and compensation framework for Information Technology (IT) positions across all City of Seattle departments. It replaces an outdated system from 1997 with a standardized structure that categorizes IT roles into specific disciplines and defines clear hierarchies for professional growth and leadership. Additionally, the bill implements a new 10-step grade pay system designed to align City salaries with current market benchmarks to ensure competitive and equitable compensation.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted July 28, 2026
Legislative journey
May 27 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jun 9 City Council Referred
Jul 17 Human Services, Labor, and Economic Development Committee Pass
Jul 28 City Council Passed
Jul 31 Mayor Signed
Jul 31 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Approval of 2025 Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy Implementation Plan

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Education & Youth
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
homeowners taxed · direct · 100% confidence

This ordinance increases property taxes for up to six years to fund education support services.

parents‑of‑young‑children served · direct · 100% confidence

The bill improves access to early learning and childcare and provides retention payments for the childcare workforce.

k12‑families served · direct · 100% confidence

The bill provides health and safety supports for students and establishes a food assistance program for low-income students during weekends and school breaks.

students served · direct · 100% confidence

The bill creates college and career pathways, including the Seattle Promise 'Path to Trades,' and provides food vouchers for low-income students.

nonprofit‑service‑providers funded · indirect · 70% confidence

The bill allocates funding for education support services, early learning, and childcare initiatives.

Population Density by District
Legally Recognized Populations
Low-Income Populations People living below the federal poverty threshold, based on household income and family size (ACS Table S1701 / B17001). Youth & Children People under age 18, per standard Census Bureau age-bracket tables. Households with Children Under 18 Households — family or non-family — with at least one person under 18 living there (ACS Table B11005). Not a legally protected category; included because bills affecting schools, childcare, or family housing tend to matter most to households in this situation. Households with a Child Under 6 Family households with at least one own child under age 6 (ACS Table B11003). The universe is total families, not all households — this table doesn't capture the rare non-family household raising a young child. Not a legally protected category; a narrower cut of the households-with-children-under-18 population, for bills specifically about early-childhood impact (childcare, pre-K, infant/toddler services).

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 Yes Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large Yes Yes

Amendments

Member / Body Amendment Date
Amendment 1 Jul 14, 2026
Amendment 10 Jul 14, 2026
Amendment 11 Jul 14, 2026
Amendment 2 Jul 14, 2026
Amendment 3 Jul 14, 2026
Amendment 4 Jul 14, 2026
Foster, Hollingsworth Report and Prioritization Requirements for SPP Voucher Pilot Program Jul 21, 2026
Amendment 5 Jul 14, 2026
Amendment 6 Jul 14, 2026
Hollingsworth, Foster Funding Food Assistance for Low-Income Students During School Breaks Jul 21, 2026
Amendment 7 Jul 14, 2026
Amendment 8 Jul 14, 2026
Amendment 9 Jul 14, 2026
Amendment A Jul 28, 2026
Amendment Vote Jul 28, 2026

What Changed From The Original

Report and Prioritization Requirements for SPP Voucher Pilot Program

This amendment requires the Department of Education and Early Learning (DEEL) to submit a detailed report on waitlist trends and stakeholder engagement before implementing the SPP Waitlist Voucher Pilot in the 2027-2028 school year. Additionally, it reallocates $927,710 originally intended for the pilot's first year to instead fund food assistance for low-income K-12 students during weekends and school breaks.

Funding Food Assistance for Low-Income Students During School Breaks

This amendment establishes a Food Assistance Program that allocates $500,000 annually over six years to provide food vouchers to low-income students during weekends and school breaks. It requires Seattle Public Schools to implement the distribution of these vouchers through school personnel starting in the 2026-2027 school year. To fund this initiative, the amendment delays the implementation of the Universal School Meals Program until the 2027-2028 school year.

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposes the 2025 Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy, which seeks to increase property taxes for up to six years to fund education support services. The funds are intended to improve access to early learning and childcare, provide health and safety supports for K-12 students, and create college and career pathways for Seattle students.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance approves the formal implementation and evaluation plan for the 2025 Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise (FEPP) Levy. The plan establishes a six-year strategic framework (2026-2031) to support students and families through a pipeline spanning early childhood, K-12 education, and career entry. Key initiatives include expanding the Seattle Promise "Path to Trades," providing child care workforce retention payments, and shifting school safety toward relationship-centered, non-punitive approaches.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted July 28, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Low Income Populations Youth And Children Households With Children Under 18 Households With A Child Under 6
Legislative journey
Apr 29 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jun 30 City Council Referred
Jul 8 Select Committee on the Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy 6-Yr. Implementation and Evaluation Plan Discussed
Jul 22 Select Committee on the Families, Education, Preschool, and Promise Levy 6-Yr. Implementation and Evaluation Plan Pass as amended
Jul 28 City Council Passed as amended
Aug 3 Mayor Signed
Aug 3 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

City Ordinance: MOA with Local 17 for Fire Protection Engineer Accretion

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Labor & Workforce Standards
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
employees‑in‑regulated‑sectors employed-by · direct · 90% confidence

This bill adds Fire Protection Engineers from the Seattle Fire Department to the PROTEC17 collective bargaining agreement, establishing new salary ranges and leave benefits for these employees.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This bill proposed authorizing a Memorandum of Agreement between the City of Seattle and the Professional and Technical Employees, Local 17 (PROTEC17). The agreement would officially add the Fire Protection Engineer classification series to PROTEC17's existing collective bargaining agreement, establishing new salary ranges and leave benefits for those employees.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the Mayor of Seattle to execute a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the union Professional and Technical Employees, Local 17 (PROTEC17). The agreement formally "accretes," or adds, the Fire Protection Engineer classification series from the Seattle Fire Department into PROTEC17's existing collective bargaining agreement. This action follows a certification by the Washington Public Employment Relations Commission naming PROTEC17 as the exclusive bargaining representative for these employees.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted July 28, 2026
Legislative journey
Jun 10 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jul 21 City Council Referred
Jul 28 City Council Passed
Jul 31 Mayor Signed
Jul 31 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

City of Seattle Authorizes Collective Bargaining Agreement with IBEW Local 77

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Labor & Workforce Standards
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
employees‑in‑regulated‑sectors employed-by · direct · 100% confidence

This bill authorizes a new four-year collective bargaining agreement that establishes the wages, hours, and working conditions for approximately 548 employees at Seattle City Light.

Legally Recognized Populations
Workers in Affected Industries People employed in a given industry sector, per Census industry-of-employment (NAICS) tables (ACS Table S2405). Describes an area's workforce mix, not any individual's employment status.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposes authorizing the Mayor to execute a new collective bargaining agreement between the City of Seattle (specifically Seattle City Light) and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 77. The agreement is intended to establish wages, hours, and benefits for employees following the expiration of their previous contract.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the Mayor of Seattle to execute a new four-year collective bargaining agreement between the City of Seattle (specifically Seattle City Light) and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local 77. The agreement establishes the employment terms, wages, and working conditions for approximately 548 represented employees following the expiration of the previous contract. Additionally, the bill notes that separate future legislation will be required to provide the necessary budget appropriations to cover the compensation items authorized in the agreement.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted July 28, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Workers In Affected Industries
Legislative journey
Jul 1 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jul 21 City Council Referred
Jul 28 City Council Passed
Jul 31 Mayor Signed
Jul 31 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

City Ordinance: Modifying Collective Bargaining Agreement with Professional and Technical Employees Local 17

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Labor & Workforce Standards
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
employees‑in‑regulated‑sectors employed-by · direct · 90% confidence

This bill increases pay scales for Bridge Electrical Maintenance Supervisors and Bridge General Maintenance Supervisors to correct a pay inversion. This ensures these supervisors' salaries reflect their level of responsibility relative to their subordinates.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This bill proposed authorizing a Memorandum of Understanding to modify the collective bargaining agreement between the City of Seattle and the Professional and Technical Employees Local 17. The goal was to adjust pay rates for Bridge Electrical and Bridge General Maintenance Supervisors to correct a "pay inversion" caused by previous city-wide pay increases.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the Mayor to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Professional and Technical Employees Local 17 (PROTEC17) union. The primary purpose is to adjust the pay scales for two specific roles within the Seattle Department of Transportation: the Bridge Electrical Maintenance Supervisor and the Bridge General Maintenance Supervisor. These adjustments are intended to correct a "pay inversion" caused by previous city-wide pay increases, ensuring that supervisor salaries appropriately reflect their level of responsibility relative to their subordinates.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted July 28, 2026
Legislative journey
Jul 1 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jul 21 City Council Referred
Jul 28 City Council Passed
Jul 31 Mayor Signed
Jul 31 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Appropriating Funds for Claims (July 13–17, 2026) and Ratifying Prior Acts

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
employees‑in‑regulated‑sectors employed-by · direct · 90% confidence

This ordinance authorizes the payment of gross payroll expenses for city employees for the period ending July 14, 2026.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay various city claims and payroll for the week of July 13 through July 17, 2026. Specifically, it authorized over $100 million in payments covering electronic financial transactions, e-payables, and gross payroll for city employees.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the City of Seattle to pay various financial obligations incurred between July 13, 2026, and July 17, 2026. It appropriates funds for general claims, e-payables, and electronic financial transactions, as well as gross payroll expenses for the period ending July 14, 2026. These payments are processed through the city's PeopleSoft system and the City General Salary Fund.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted July 28, 2026
Legislative journey
Jul 28 City Council Referred
Jul 28 City Council Passed
Jul 31 Mayor Signed
Jul 31 Mayor Returned

Council Bill Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Proposed 2026 Ballot Measure for Seattle Transit Sales and Use TaxCompleteness: 5/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Taxes & Revenue
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
In Committee (Amendable)
Select Committee on Seattle Transportation Benefit District
This bill is in committee. Council members can still propose amendments.
Contact your representative
Who’s affected & how
transit‑riders served · direct · 90% confidence

This bill proposes a sales tax to fund transit services, including a requirement that a minimum percentage of revenue be dedicated to transit service hours and the prioritization of night service.

wheelchair‑and‑mobility‑device‑users served · direct · 80% confidence

The bill explicitly includes funding for ADA improvements and accessible pedestrian connections for people with mobility, sensory, and cognitive disabilities.

pedestrians served · direct · 70% confidence

The bill provides for the creation of accessible pedestrian connections.

students served · direct · 70% confidence

The bill expands the Transit Access Program to include students attending trade schools.

small‑business‑owners taxed · direct · 60% confidence

This bill proposes a new sales and use tax, which creates a financial burden for those paying the tax.

Population Density by District
Legally Recognized Populations
People with Disabilities People reporting serious difficulty in at least one of six Census domains: hearing, vision, cognitive, ambulatory, self-care, or independent living (ACS disability questions). Protected under the ADA / Section 504, not Title VI. Low-Income Populations People living below the federal poverty threshold, based on household income and family size (ACS Table S1701 / B17001). Populations Facing Environmental Harm Not a single Census variable — identified by layering ACS demographics over environmental-exposure data (pollution sources, air toxics, hazardous sites), the approach used by EPA's now-discontinued EJScreen and Washington's Environmental Health Disparities Map.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

Amendments

Member / Body Amendment Date
Amendment Packet Jul 4, 2026
Amendment Packet Jul 14, 2026

What Was Originally ProposedCompleteness: 4/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

This ordinance proposed placing a proposition on the November 3, 2026, ballot for Seattle voters to decide on a new sales and use tax. If approved, the tax would be used to fund transit and related transportation programs within the city.

What The Final Text DoesCompleteness: 3/5
Faithfulness: 4/5

This ordinance proposes placing a ballot measure before Seattle voters in the November 3, 2026, general election to authorize a sales and use tax. The tax is intended to replace the existing Seattle Transit Measure (STM), which is set to expire in March 2027, to ensure continued funding for transit and related transportation programs. While the current tax rate is 0.15%, the Mayor's office has proposed increasing it to 0.3% to further support city transportation projects and expanded transit eligibility.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee Select Committee on Seattle Transportation Benefit District
Transmitted July 21, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
People With Disabilities Low Income Populations Populations Facing Environmental Harm
Legislative journey
May 27 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jun 16 City Council Referred
Jun 18 Select Committee on Seattle Transportation Benefit District Discussed
Jul 16 Select Committee on Seattle Transportation Benefit District Pass as amended
Jul 21 City Council Passed as amended

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

City Light Ordinance: New Retail Rates, Data Center Class, and Code Amendments

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Electricity & Energy
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
homeowners taxed · direct · 80% confidence

This bill establishes new retail electricity rate schedules for 2027 and 2028 to address aging infrastructure and rising energy costs.

renters taxed · direct · 80% confidence

This bill establishes new retail electricity rate schedules for 2027 and 2028 to address aging infrastructure and rising energy costs.

small‑business‑owners taxed · direct · 70% confidence

This bill establishes new retail electricity rate schedules for 2027 and 2028 to address aging infrastructure and rising energy costs.

developers‑and‑builders regulated · direct · 60% confidence

This bill modifies service connection charges and creates a specific customer class and service conditions for data centers that introduce new large electrical loads.

Population Density by District
Legally Recognized Populations
Low-Income Populations People living below the federal poverty threshold, based on household income and family size (ACS Table S1701 / B17001).

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

Amendments

Member / Body Amendment Date
Amendment 1 Jul 14, 2026

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed establishing new retail rate schedules for Seattle City Light, including the creation of a specific customer class and service conditions for data centers with large electricity demands. Additionally, it sought to modify service connection charges and enhance the rate stabilization account mechanism.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance establishes new retail electricity rate schedules for Seattle City Light customers for the years 2027 and 2028 to address rising energy costs and aging infrastructure. It creates a specific customer class and set of service conditions for data centers that introduce new large electrical loads. Additionally, the bill modifies service connection charges, updates the rate stabilization account mechanism, and amends several sections of the Seattle Municipal Code to align with the utility's 2027-2032 Strategic Plan.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted July 21, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Low Income Populations
Legislative journey
May 27 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jun 16 City Council Referred
Jun 17 Parks and City Light Committee Discussed
Jul 15 Parks and City Light Committee Pass as amended
Jul 21 City Council Passed
Jul 22 Mayor Signed
Jul 22 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

City Light Authorized to Sign 10-Year Transportation Electrification Agreements

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Electricity & Energy
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
drivers served · indirect · 80% confidence

This bill accelerates the installation of electric vehicle charging stations, which increases the availability of charging infrastructure for drivers.

small‑business‑owners served · direct · 60% confidence

This bill allows eligible customers to enter into ten-year agreements with Seattle City Light to support the installation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure.

developers‑and‑builders served · direct · 60% confidence

This bill authorizes ten-year agreements that encourage larger upfront investments in electric vehicle charging infrastructure projects.

freight‑and‑delivery‑operators served · indirect · 50% confidence

This bill accelerates the installation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure to meet anticipated demand, supporting the transition to electric transportation.

Legally Recognized Populations
Populations Facing Environmental Harm Not a single Census variable — identified by layering ACS demographics over environmental-exposure data (pollution sources, air toxics, hazardous sites), the approach used by EPA's now-discontinued EJScreen and Washington's Environmental Health Disparities Map.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed authorizing the City Light Department to enter into ten-year agreements with customers eligible for transportation electrification programs. The goal was to accelerate the installation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure to meet anticipated demand and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes Seattle City Light (SCL) to enter into long-term agreements of up to ten years with customers participating in transportation electrification programs. These extended contracts are designed to "future-proof" infrastructure projects, encouraging larger upfront investments to accelerate the installation of electric vehicle (EV) charging stations. The initiative aims to meet anticipated demand and support the City's greenhouse gas emission reduction goals without increasing net costs to ratepayers.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted July 21, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Populations Facing Environmental Harm
Legislative journey
Jun 24 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jul 14 City Council Referred
Jul 15 Parks and City Light Committee Pass
Jul 21 City Council Passed
Jul 22 Mayor Signed
Jul 22 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Transfer of Lake City Garage and Plaza Management to Seattle Parks and Recreation

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
City Property & Real Estate
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
renters served · indirect · 80% confidence

By transferring the property to Seattle Parks and Recreation, the city enables a redevelopment project to create affordable housing.

nonprofit‑service‑providers served · indirect · 70% confidence

This transfer of management authority allows a collaborative effort between the city and Mercy Housing Northwest to proceed.

developers‑and‑builders served · indirect · 60% confidence

The shift in jurisdiction is a prerequisite for a larger redevelopment project to build a new community center and affordable housing.

drivers sited-near · indirect · 50% confidence

The bill transfers the management of the Lake City Garage and Plaza to Seattle Parks and Recreation as part of a redevelopment plan.

Population Density by District
Legally Recognized Populations
Low-Income Populations People living below the federal poverty threshold, based on household income and family size (ACS Table S1701 / B17001).

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed transferring the jurisdiction and management authority of the Lake City Garage and Plaza from the Department of Finance and Administrative Services to Seattle Parks and Recreation. The goal was to consolidate the management of these municipal properties under a single department.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance transfers the jurisdiction and management authority of the Lake City Garage and Plaza from the Department of Finance and Administrative Services (FAS) to Seattle Parks and Recreation (SPR). This administrative shift is a necessary prerequisite for a larger redevelopment project to create a new Lake City Community Center co-located with affordable housing. By moving the property to SPR, the city enables the collaborative effort between SPR, the Office of Housing, and Mercy Housing Northwest to proceed.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted July 21, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Low Income Populations
Legislative journey
Jul 1 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jul 14 City Council Referred
Jul 15 Parks and City Light Committee Pass
Jul 21 City Council Passed
Jul 22 Mayor Signed
Jul 22 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Appropriating Funds for Claims (July 6–10, 2026) and Ratifying Prior Acts

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay various city claims and electronic financial transactions for the week of July 6 through July 10, 2026. Specifically, it sought approval for payments totaling over $70 million via mechanical warrants, e-payables, and electronic financial transactions.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the City of Seattle to pay various financial obligations and claims incurred between July 6, 2026, and July 10, 2026. The total funding covers payroll and bills processed through PeopleSoft, including mechanical warrants, e-payables, and electronic financial transactions. In total, the bill appropriates approximately $70.1 million to settle these specific expenditures.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted July 21, 2026
Legislative journey
Jul 21 City Council Referred
Jul 21 City Council Passed
Jul 22 Mayor Signed
Jul 22 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Seattle Establishes Forensic Digital Evidence Pay Scales for Police Department

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Public Safety & Policing
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
employees‑in‑regulated‑sectors employed-by · direct · 90% confidence

This bill establishes a new Forensic Digital Evidence classification series with four job titles and a five-step salary progression to ensure staff are properly compensated for their duties.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the creation of a new "Forensic Digital Evidence" classification series within the Seattle Police Department. Specifically, it sought to establish two new job titles, rename two existing titles, and set corresponding pay rates for these roles effective December 31, 2024.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance establishes a new "Forensic Digital Evidence" (FDE) classification title series and corresponding pay scales within the Seattle Police Department. Recommended by the Seattle Department of Human Resources, the bill modernizes existing job titles to more accurately reflect the current professional duties and responsibilities of staff. The new series includes four distinct job titles, each featuring a five-step salary progression to ensure employees are properly compensated for their work.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted July 14, 2026
Legislative journey
Apr 8 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
May 19 City Council Referred
Jul 2 Human Services, Labor, and Economic Development Committee Pass
Jul 14 City Council Passed
Jul 17 Mayor Signed
Jul 17 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Updated Income Thresholds for Seattle’s Utility Discount Program

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Water, Sewer & Drainage
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
renters served · direct · 80% confidence

This bill expands eligibility for the Utility Discount Program by raising income thresholds, allowing more low-income households to receive a 60% discount on electric bills and a 50% discount on water, wastewater, drainage, and solid waste bills.

homeowners served · direct · 80% confidence

This bill expands eligibility for the Utility Discount Program by raising income thresholds, allowing more low-income households to receive a 60% discount on electric bills and a 50% discount on water, wastewater, drainage, and solid waste bills.

older‑adults served · direct · 60% confidence

This bill expands eligibility for the Utility Discount Program by raising income thresholds for low-income households to receive discounts on electric and Seattle Public Utilities bills.

Population Density by District
Legally Recognized Populations
Low-Income Populations People living below the federal poverty threshold, based on household income and family size (ACS Table S1701 / B17001).

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

Amendments

Member / Body Amendment Date
Amendment 1 Jul 7, 2026
Amendment Vote Jul 14, 2026

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed updating the income thresholds required to qualify for the Utility Discount Program. Specifically, it aimed to adjust the eligibility limits for residents seeking discounts on water, wastewater, drainage, solid waste, and electric utility services.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance expands eligibility for Seattle's Utility Discount Program (UDP) by amending the income thresholds required to qualify for assistance. Eligible low-income households receive a 60% discount on Seattle City Light bills and a 50% discount on Seattle Public Utilities bills. The bill aims to make these services more accessible to prevent displacement and comply with the Clean Energy Transformation Act. Additionally, the legislation modifies the implementation timeline for these threshold increases and introduces new oversight requirements.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by City Clerk
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted July 14, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Low Income Populations
Legislative journey
Jun 2 City Council Referred
Jun 11 Governance and Utilities Committee Discussed
Jul 9 Governance and Utilities Committee Pass as amended
Jul 14 City Council Passed
Jul 17 Mayor Signed
Jul 17 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Appropriating Funds for Claims (June 29 – July 3, 2026)

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
gig‑and‑contract‑workers funded · direct · 60% confidence

This bill authorizes over $153 million to pay general claims and electronic financial transactions, which includes payments to those providing services to the city.

nonprofit‑service‑providers funded · direct · 60% confidence

This bill authorizes over $153 million to pay general claims and electronic financial transactions, which includes payments to organizations providing services to the city.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay various city claims and electronic transactions for the week of June 29 through July 3, 2026. Specifically, it sought approval for over $153 million in general claims and approximately $79 million for gross payroll expenses ending June 30, 2026.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the City of Seattle to appropriate and distribute funds to pay various claims and payroll obligations for the week of June 29, 2026, through July 3, 2026. Specifically, it approves over $153 million for general claims, e-payables, and electronic financial transactions. Additionally, it allocates approximately $79.4 million to cover gross payroll for the period ending June 30, 2026.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted July 14, 2026
Legislative journey
Jul 14 City Council Referred
Jul 14 City Council Passed
Jul 17 Mayor Signed
Jul 17 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Authorizing Long-Term Electric Power Agreements for City Light Department

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Electricity & Energy
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
homeowners served · indirect · 70% confidence

By allowing Seattle City Light to sign power agreements for up to 240 months, this bill helps secure a stable renewable energy supply for residents as building electrification increases.

renters served · indirect · 70% confidence

This bill enables the city to enter long-term contracts for electric power and transmission to meet rising demand from building electrification.

small‑business‑owners served · indirect · 70% confidence

The bill authorizes longer power purchase agreements to ensure the city remains competitive in the renewable energy market as electricity demand grows.

developers‑and‑builders served · indirect · 60% confidence

This bill allows Seattle City Light to secure the long-term energy resources and transmission services needed to support growth from new data centers and electrification.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed authorizing the Seattle City Light Department to enter into long-term agreements to acquire electric power, transmission, and ancillary services. The measure was driven by a forecasted increase in electricity demand through 2045 due to decarbonization efforts and the growth of data centers. By securing long-term power purchase agreements, the Department aimed to ensure a stable supply of renewable energy in an increasingly competitive market.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance amends the Seattle Municipal Code to authorize the Seattle City Light Department to enter into long-term power purchase agreements for electric power, transmission, and ancillary services. Specifically, the bill seeks to extend the department's authority to execute these agreements for terms of up to 240 months. This change is intended to help the city secure necessary energy resources amidst rising demand driven by electric vehicles, building electrification, and new data centers. By allowing for longer contracts, the city aims to remain competitive in a tightening market for renewable energy.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted July 7, 2026
Legislative journey
Jun 17 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jun 30 City Council Referred
Jul 1 Parks and City Light Committee Pass
Jul 7 City Council Passed
Jul 9 Mayor Signed
Jul 9 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Appropriating Funds for Claims (June 22–26, 2026) and Ratifying Prior Acts

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay various city claims and electronic financial transactions for the week of June 22 through June 26, 2026. Specifically, it authorized payments totaling over $114 million via mechanical warrants, e-payables, and electronic financial transfers.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the Seattle City Council to appropriate funds to pay various city claims and financial obligations for the week of June 22, 2026, through June 26, 2026. The payments include payroll and bills processed through PeopleSoft, e-payables, and electronic financial transactions. In total, the legislation approves expenditures exceeding $114 million to cover these obligations.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted July 7, 2026
Legislative journey
Jul 7 City Council Referred
Jul 7 City Council Passed
Jul 9 Mayor Signed
Jul 9 Mayor Returned

Council Bill Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Adopting the 2023 Seattle Housing Levy Plan and Funding Policies (2026-2028)Completeness: 4/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Housing & Tenancy
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
In Committee (Amendable)
Housing, Arts, and Civil Rights Committee
This bill is in committee. Council members can still propose amendments.
Contact your representative
Who’s affected & how
renters served · indirect · 90% confidence

This bill establishes funding priorities and guidelines to produce and provide affordable housing for low-income households.

developers‑and‑builders funded · direct · 90% confidence

This bill provides funding for the new production of affordable rental developments and allows for supplemental funding awards to support housing development.

nonprofit‑service‑providers funded · direct · 90% confidence

This bill provides funding for affordable housing preservation activities and the production of new affordable rental developments.

people‑experiencing‑homelessness served · indirect · 80% confidence

This bill sets the financial plan and funding policies to provide and produce affordable housing for low-income households.

Population Density by District
Legally Recognized Populations
Low-Income Populations People living below the federal poverty threshold, based on household income and family size (ACS Table S1701 / B17001).

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large Yes Yes

Amendments

Member / Body Amendment Date
Foster Housing Funding Policy Updates Jun 30, 2026

What Changed From The Original

Housing Funding Policy Updates

The amendment establishes detailed guidelines for supplemental funding in the Housing Funding Policies, including the use of debt restructure stabilization loans and funding adjustments to support affordable housing development. It requires the Office of Housing to prioritize new production of affordable rental developments and balance remaining funds between preservation activities and supplemental funding for debt restructuring based on need. The amendment also provides discretion to the Office of Housing to approve supplemental funding awards outside of the regular Notice of Funding Availability process in emergency or time-sensitive situations.

What Was Originally ProposedCompleteness: 5/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

This ordinance proposed the adoption of the Administrative and Financial Plan and the Housing Funding Policies for the 2023 Seattle Housing Levy for the 2026-2028 program years. Additionally, it sought to authorize the Director of Housing to manage past and future housing loans and contracts while ratifying previous related actions.

What The Final Text DoesCompleteness: 4/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

This ordinance adopts the Administrative and Financial Plan (A&F Plan) and the Housing Funding Policies for program years 2026-2028 to guide the implementation of the 2023 Seattle Housing Levy. These documents establish the guidelines, funding priorities, and technical frameworks for using levy funds and other city resources to provide and produce affordable housing for low-income households. Additionally, the bill authorizes the Director of Housing to manage related loans and contracts and ratifies previous administrative actions.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee Housing, Arts, and Civil Rights Committee
Transmitted June 30, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Low Income Populations
Legislative journey
May 13 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jun 2 City Council Referred
Jun 10 Housing, Arts, and Civil Rights Committee Discussed
Jun 24 Housing, Arts, and Civil Rights Committee Pass as amended
Jun 30 City Council Passed

Council Bill Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Establishing Operations and Duties for the Community Assisted Response and Engagement DepartmentCompleteness: 5/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Public Safety & Policing
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
In Committee (Amendable)
Public Safety Committee
This bill is in committee. Council members can still propose amendments.
Contact your representative
Who’s affected & how
people‑experiencing‑homelessness served · direct · 80% confidence

This bill establishes the Community Crisis Responder team to provide behavioral health professional support to persons in crisis as part of the city's public safety response.

nonprofit‑service‑providers served · indirect · 50% confidence

This bill formalizes the CARE Department's operations and its coordination with police and fire departments to support people in crisis.

Population Density by District
Legally Recognized Populations
People with Disabilities People reporting serious difficulty in at least one of six Census domains: hearing, vision, cognitive, ambulatory, self-care, or independent living (ACS disability questions). Protected under the ADA / Section 504, not Title VI.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally ProposedCompleteness: 3/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

This ordinance proposes to define the operations and duties of the Community Assisted Response and Engagement (CARE) Department and its Community Crisis Responder (CCR) team. It aims to formalize the role of behavioral health professionals in Seattle's public safety response and update the Seattle Municipal Code accordingly.

What The Final Text DoesCompleteness: 3/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

This ordinance updates the Seattle Municipal Code to formally define the operations and duties of the Community Assisted Response and Engagement (CARE) Department. Specifically, it outlines the role of the Community Crisis Responder (CCR) team as a key component of the city's diversified public safety response. By amending and adding sections to the Municipal Code, the bill clarifies how the CARE Department works alongside the police and fire departments to support persons in crisis.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by City Clerk
Assigned committee Public Safety Committee
Transmitted June 30, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
People With Disabilities
Legislative journey
Jun 16 City Council Referred
Jun 23 Public Safety Committee Pass
Jun 30 City Council Passed

Council Bill Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance to Expand Street Closure Authority for Public Safety (Emergency Measure)Completeness: 5/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Transportation & Streets
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
In Committee (Amendable)
Public Safety Committee
This bill is in committee. Council members can still propose amendments.
Contact your representative
Who’s affected & how
drivers regulated · direct · 90% confidence

The Director of Transportation now has the authority to close public streets to enhance public safety, which restricts where drivers can travel.

freight‑and‑delivery‑operators regulated · direct · 80% confidence

The Director of Transportation can now close public streets for public safety reasons, creating barriers for freight and delivery vehicle access.

cyclists regulated · direct · 70% confidence

The Director of Transportation is now authorized to close public streets for public safety, which restricts the routes available to cyclists.

homeowners represented-by · indirect · 70% confidence

This bill aims to benefit residents in areas experiencing group-based and gun violence, such as neighborhoods near Aurora Ave N, by allowing the city to close streets for safety.

renters represented-by · indirect · 70% confidence

This bill aims to benefit residents in areas experiencing group-based and gun violence, such as neighborhoods near Aurora Ave N, by allowing the city to close streets for safety.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally ProposedCompleteness: 4/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

This ordinance proposed amending the Seattle Municipal Code to grant the Director of Transportation the authority to close public streets for public safety reasons, extending a power previously limited to alleys. The proposal was specifically prompted by a rise in group-based violence and shootings in neighborhoods off Aurora Ave N, where residents had already begun blocking streets themselves to increase safety.

What The Final Text DoesCompleteness: 5/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

This ordinance expands the authority of the Director of Transportation to close public streets for the purpose of maintaining or enhancing public safety. Previously, the Seattle Municipal Code only granted the Director the power to close alleys for these reasons. The legislation was prompted by a rise in group-based and gun violence in neighborhoods near Aurora Ave N. If passed by a 3/4 vote of the City Council, the ordinance would take effect immediately as an emergency measure.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by City Clerk
Assigned committee Public Safety Committee
Transmitted June 30, 2026
Legislative journey
Jun 16 City Council Referred
Jun 23 Public Safety Committee Pass
Jun 30 City Council Passed

Council Bill Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Authorizing Ground Lease for Affordable Housing and Early Learning CenterCompleteness: 4/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Housing & Tenancy
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
In Committee (Amendable)
Housing, Arts, and Civil Rights Committee
This bill is in committee. Council members can still propose amendments.
Contact your representative
Who’s affected & how
renters served · direct · 90% confidence

This bill authorizes the development of affordable housing on city-owned property at 2929 27th Ave South.

parents‑of‑young‑children served · direct · 90% confidence

This bill authorizes the creation of commercial space dedicated to early learning and childcare services.

nonprofit‑service‑providers served · direct · 90% confidence

This bill grants a 99-year ground lease for $1 per year to MBTOD Phase One LLLP, an affiliate of Mercy Housing Northwest and El Centro de la Raza.

caregivers served · direct · 80% confidence

This bill authorizes the development of commercial space intended for use as a childcare center and associated uses.

developers‑and‑builders served · direct · 70% confidence

This bill reduces development costs by granting a ground lease for city-owned property at a nominal rent of $1 per year.

Population Density by District
Legally Recognized Populations
Low-Income Populations People living below the federal poverty threshold, based on household income and family size (ACS Table S1701 / B17001). Youth & Children People under age 18, per standard Census Bureau age-bracket tables. Households with Children Under 18 Households — family or non-family — with at least one person under 18 living there (ACS Table B11005). Not a legally protected category; included because bills affecting schools, childcare, or family housing tend to matter most to households in this situation. Households with a Child Under 6 Family households with at least one own child under age 6 (ACS Table B11003). The universe is total families, not all households — this table doesn't capture the rare non-family household raising a young child. Not a legally protected category; a narrower cut of the households-with-children-under-18 population, for bills specifically about early-childhood impact (childcare, pre-K, infant/toddler services).

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large Yes Yes

Amendments

Member / Body Amendment Date
Councilmember Foster Corrects Property Legal Description Jun 30, 2026

What Changed From The Original

Corrects Property Legal Description

This amendment establishes a corrected legal description of the property at 2929 27th Ave South, which is being developed, by updating Attachment 1 to the Ordinance. It requires that the property's full legal description, including parcel numbers and boundaries, be accurately reflected in the attachment. The amendment prohibits any discrepancies in the property's description by providing a detailed and precise outline of the parcel boundaries and exceptions.

What Was Originally ProposedCompleteness: 5/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

This ordinance proposed granting a ground lease for the property at 2929 27th Ave South to MBTOD Phase One LLLP, an affiliate of Mercy Housing Northwest and El Centro de la Raza. The goal was to authorize the development of affordable housing and commercial space dedicated to early learning and childcare services.

What The Final Text DoesCompleteness: 4/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

This ordinance authorizes the Seattle Office of Housing to grant a 99-year ground lease for city-owned property located at 2929 27th Ave South to MBTOD Phase One LLLP, an affiliate of Mercy Housing Northwest and El Centro de la Raza. The lease is proposed at a nominal rent of $1 per year to reduce development costs. The primary goal of the legislation is to facilitate the construction of affordable housing and commercial spaces dedicated to early learning and childcare services.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee Housing, Arts, and Civil Rights Committee
Transmitted June 30, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Low Income Populations Youth And Children Households With Children Under 18 Households With A Child Under 6
Legislative journey
Jun 10 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jun 23 City Council Referred
Jun 24 Housing, Arts, and Civil Rights Committee Pass
Jun 30 City Council Passed as amended

Council Bill Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Seattle Ordinance: Transferring Montlake Property to Office of Housing for Developer SelectionCompleteness: 4/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Housing & Tenancy
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
In Committee (Amendable)
Housing, Arts, and Civil Rights Committee
This bill is in committee. Council members can still propose amendments.
Contact your representative
Who’s affected & how
homeowners served · direct · 90% confidence

This bill creates at least 50 permanently affordable owner-occupied homes for low- and moderate-income households in the Montlake neighborhood.

developers‑and‑builders served · direct · 80% confidence

The bill authorizes the Office of Housing to launch a competitive request for proposals to select a preferred developer to receive the land and deed.

district‑4 represented-by · indirect · 70% confidence

This bill brings new permanently affordable housing to the Montlake neighborhood located within this district.

Population Density by District
Legally Recognized Populations
Low-Income Populations People living below the federal poverty threshold, based on household income and family size (ACS Table S1701 / B17001).

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally ProposedCompleteness: 4/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

The bill proposed placing acquired real property in the Montlake neighborhood under the jurisdiction of the Seattle Office of Housing. It authorized the office to launch a competitive request for proposals to select a preferred developer and to execute the necessary contracts to transfer the land and deed to that developer.

What The Final Text DoesCompleteness: 4/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

This ordinance authorizes the Seattle Office of Housing (OH) to acquire a site in the Montlake neighborhood from the Washington State Department of Transportation for $6,050,000. The goal of the acquisition is to develop at least 50 permanently affordable owner-occupied homes for low- and moderate-income households. To achieve this, the bill empowers the OH to launch a competitive request for proposals to select a preferred developer and execute the necessary contracts to transfer the land.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee Housing, Arts, and Civil Rights Committee
Transmitted June 30, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Low Income Populations
Legislative journey
May 27 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jun 23 City Council Referred
Jun 24 Housing, Arts, and Civil Rights Committee Pass
Jun 30 City Council Passed

Council Bill Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Authorizing Land Acquisition for Affordable Homeownership Units in the Central AreaCompleteness: 5/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Housing & Tenancy
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
In Committee (Amendable)
Housing, Arts, and Civil Rights Committee
This bill is in committee. Council members can still propose amendments.
Contact your representative
Who’s affected & how
homeowners served · direct · 90% confidence

This bill authorizes the acquisition of land to develop affordable homeownership units.

developers‑and‑builders served · direct · 80% confidence

The bill allows the Director of the Office of Housing to issue a request for proposals to select a developer to execute the project.

district‑3 represented-by · indirect · 70% confidence

This bill authorizes the development of affordable homeownership units on two parcels of land located in the Central Area.

Population Density by District
Legally Recognized Populations
Low-Income Populations People living below the federal poverty threshold, based on household income and family size (ACS Table S1701 / B17001).

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally ProposedCompleteness: 5/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

This ordinance proposed that the Office of Housing acquire two parcels of land in Seattle's Central Area to develop affordable homeownership units. It authorized the Office of Housing to manage the property and empowered its Director to select a developer through a request for proposals to execute the project.

What The Final Text DoesCompleteness: 5/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

This ordinance authorizes the Seattle Office of Housing to acquire two parcels of land in the Central Area to be used for the development of affordable homeownership units. It grants the Director of the Office of Housing the authority to manage the property and launch a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) process to select a developer. Once a developer is chosen, the Director is authorized to execute the necessary contracts and deeds to transfer the land for construction.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee Housing, Arts, and Civil Rights Committee
Transmitted June 30, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Low Income Populations
Legislative journey
May 27 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jun 23 City Council Referred
Jun 24 Housing, Arts, and Civil Rights Committee Pass
Jun 30 City Council Passed

Council Bill Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Approving Claims Payments (June 15–19, 2026) and Ratifying Prior ActsCompleteness: 5/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Who’s affected & how
gig‑and‑contract‑workers funded · direct · 60% confidence

This bill authorizes the payment of over $51 million for general claims, e-payables, and electronic financial transactions. This provides direct funding for those receiving payments through these city claim processes.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally ProposedCompleteness: 4/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay various city claims and electronic transactions totaling over $51 million for the week of June 15–19, 2026. Additionally, it sought approval for approximately $73.8 million to cover gross payroll expenses for the period ending June 16, 2026.

What The Final Text DoesCompleteness: 4/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

This ordinance authorizes the City of Seattle to pay various claims and payroll expenses for the week of June 15 through June 19, 2026. It approves the disbursement of approximately $51.2 million for general claims, e-payables, and electronic financial transactions. Additionally, it appropriates $73,879,988.50 to cover gross payroll costs for the period ending June 16, 2026.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee Full Council
Transmitted June 30, 2026
Legislative journey
Jun 30 City Council Referred
Jun 30 City Council Passed

Population density maps use the ACS 2023 5-Year Estimates (2019-2023), tables B01001, B02001, B03002, B11003, B11005, B13002, B16002, B17001, B18101, retrieved 2026-09-24. Council district boundaries: seattleio/seattle-boundaries-data (community-maintained, not an official City of Seattle GIS source). Aggregation methodology Census tract estimates apportioned to City Council districts by area-weighted overlay: each tract's counts are split across districts in proportion to the share of the tract's land area falling in each district, then summed per district. District boundaries: seattleio/seattle-boundaries-data (community-maintained, not an official City of Seattle GIS source). Tract boundaries: US Census Bureau TIGER/Line cartographic boundary files, 2023 vintage. Citywide figures are queried directly at the Seattle place level, not resummed from districts. ACS 5-year estimates carry sampling error that can be substantial at the tract level; treat percentages as estimates, not precise counts.