Learn: A Proof of Concept Seattle Legislative Plain-Text Translator

Previous Legislation
May 19 – Jun 23, 2026

Learn•Connect•Engage

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Amendment to 2025 Budget and 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed amending the 2025 Budget and the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Specifically, it sought to reallocate appropriations across various city departments and budget control levels.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance amends the 2025 Adopted Budget and the 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program to address unforeseen costs. Specifically, it increases appropriations to various city departments by a total of $8,066,027 to cover expenses that were not initially accounted for. By providing this retroactive budget authority, the bill allows the city to finalize its accounting process for the year and cover spending that exceeded previous budget limits.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 23, 2026
Legislative journey
Apr 1 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
May 12 City Council Referred
May 15 Finance, Native Communities, and Tribal Governments Committee Discussed
Jun 16 Finance, Native Communities, and Tribal Governments Committee Pass
Jun 23 City Council Passed
Jun 26 Mayor Signed
Jun 26 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Amending the 2026 Budget and Capital Improvement Program via 3/4 Council Vote

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed amending the 2026 Budget and the 2026-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Specifically, it sought to reallocate appropriations across various city departments, budget control levels, and funds.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance amends the 2026 Budget to re-appropriate approximately $138 million in unexpended non-capital funds from the 2025 budget. By continuing these funds, the bill prevents them from lapsing at the end of the fiscal year, allowing the city to complete initiatives and projects that were not fully utilized. The legislation redistributes these funds across various city departments and budget control levels to cover necessary costs and expenses.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 23, 2026
Legislative journey
Apr 1 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
May 12 City Council Referred
May 15 Finance, Native Communities, and Tribal Governments Committee Discussed
Jun 16 Finance, Native Communities, and Tribal Governments Committee Pass
Jun 23 City Council Passed
Jun 26 Mayor Signed
Jun 26 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

City Light Agreement for Pier 48 and Colman Dock Electrification Project

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Electricity & Energy
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
transit‑riders served · indirect · 80% confidence

This bill authorizes the construction of electrical system improvements and submersible cables to provide power for hybrid-electric ferry charging at Colman Dock and Pier 48. This supports the transition of the Washington State Ferries fleet to be emissions-free by 2050.

district‑7 sited-near · indirect · 60% confidence

This bill authorizes Seattle City Light to implement electrification projects and install power infrastructure at Pier 48 and the Seattle Terminal (Colman Dock).

Legally Recognized Populations
Populations Facing Environmental Harm Not a single Census variable — identified by layering ACS demographics over environmental-exposure data (pollution sources, air toxics, hazardous sites), the approach used by EPA's now-discontinued EJScreen and Washington's Environmental Health Disparities Map.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed authorizing Seattle City Light to enter into a five-year agreement with Washington State Ferries to build system improvements for the electrification of Pier 48 and the Seattle Terminal (Colman Dock). Additionally, it authorized the negotiation and execution of a subsequent operations agreement to manage the project.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes Seattle City Light to enter into a five-year agreement with Washington State Ferries to implement the Seattle Terminal (Colman Dock) Electrification Project. The project involves constructing system improvements and installing submersible cables from Pier 48 to provide 30 megawatts of power for hybrid-electric ferry charging. This initiative supports Washington State Ferries' broader goal of transitioning to an emissions-free fleet by 2050. Additionally, the bill allows for the negotiation and execution of a subsequent operations agreement to manage the new electrical services.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 23, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Populations Facing Environmental Harm
Legislative journey
May 20 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jun 16 City Council Referred
Jun 17 Parks and City Light Committee Pass
Jun 23 City Council Passed
Jun 26 Mayor Signed
Jun 26 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Amending King County Conservation Futures Agreement for Seattle Open Space Funding (2025-2026)

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Parks, Open Space & Recreation
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
district‑1 served · direct · 80% confidence

This bill provides funding for open space acquisition projects in Belltown, which is located within this district.

district‑2 served · direct · 80% confidence

This bill provides funding for open space acquisition projects in the North Beacon Hill and Mt. Baker Urban Villages.

district‑3 served · direct · 80% confidence

This bill provides funding for open space acquisition projects in the Lakeridge Park area.

district‑4 served · direct · 80% confidence

This bill provides funding for open space acquisition projects in the Westwood-Highland Park and Delridge Native Forest areas.

district‑5 served · direct · 80% confidence

This bill provides funding for open space acquisition projects along Longfellow Creek.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed authorizing the Mayor to enter into an amendment to an interlocal agreement with King County regarding the Conservation Futures Levy. Specifically, it sought to allow the City of Seattle to deposit levy proceeds from 2025 reallocations and 2026 allocations into the city's Park and Recreation Fund for open space acquisition projects.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the Mayor or their designee to enter into Amendment 6 of an interlocal agreement with King County to secure funding for open space acquisition projects. It allows the City of Seattle to receive and deposit up to $7,248,000 from the 2025 and 2026 King County Conservation Futures Levy allocations into the City's Park and Recreation Fund. These funds are specifically designated for the purchase of open space and natural resource lands within the city.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 23, 2026
Legislative journey
Jun 3 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jun 16 City Council Referred
Jun 17 Parks and City Light Committee Pass
Jun 23 City Council Passed
Jun 26 Mayor Signed
Jun 26 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Seattle Ordinance to Expand and Preserve Delridge Native Forest

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Parks, Open Space & Recreation
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
district‑1 represented-by · indirect · 70% confidence

This bill authorizes the expansion and permanent preservation of the Delridge Native Forest, providing an ecological benefit to the residents represented by the council.

homeowners sited-near · indirect · 60% confidence

The authorization to acquire and preserve real property in the Delridge neighborhood increases the amount of permanent greenspace near local homes.

transit‑riders sited-near · indirect · 50% confidence

The bill allows the city to acquire land to offset greenspace conversions required by Sound Transit’s West Seattle Link Extension.

Legally Recognized Populations
Populations Facing Environmental Harm Not a single Census variable — identified by layering ACS demographics over environmental-exposure data (pollution sources, air toxics, hazardous sites), the approach used by EPA's now-discontinued EJScreen and Washington's Environmental Health Disparities Map.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed authorizing the Superintendent of Seattle Parks and Recreation to identify and acquire real property in West Seattle to permanently preserve and expand the Delridge Native Forest. It granted blanket authority for future acquisitions, specifically including land that may be impacted by the West Seattle Link Extension. Additionally, it authorized the execution of all necessary purchase and sale agreements as funding became available.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the Superintendent of Seattle Parks and Recreation to identify, negotiate, and acquire real property and property rights in West Seattle's Delridge neighborhood. The primary goal is the permanent preservation and expansion of the Delridge Native Forest to support ecological integrity and climate resilience. Notably, the bill grants "blanket authority" for future acquisitions, including land related to Sound Transit’s West Seattle Link Extension to offset necessary greenspace conversions. Finally, it empowers the Superintendent to execute the necessary purchase and sale agreements as funding becomes available.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 23, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Populations Facing Environmental Harm
Legislative journey
Jun 3 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jun 16 City Council Referred
Jun 17 Parks and City Light Committee Pass
Jun 23 City Council Passed
Jun 26 Mayor Signed
Jun 26 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Appropriating Funds for Claims (June 8–12, 2026) and Ratifying Prior Acts

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay various city claims and electronic financial transactions for the week of June 8 through June 12, 2026. Specifically, it authorized payments totaling over $92 million via mechanical warrants, e-payables, and electronic financial transfers.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the City of Seattle to pay approximately $92 million in financial obligations for the week of June 8, 2026, through June 12, 2026. The total includes $23.1 million in mechanical warrants, $26,817.10 in e-payables, and $68.8 million in electronic financial transactions. This legislation is required by state law (RCW 42.24.180) to ensure that payroll and bill expenses are paid in accordance with the city's adopted budget.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 23, 2026
Legislative journey
Jun 23 City Council Referred
Jun 23 City Council Passed
Jun 26 Mayor Signed
Jun 26 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Seattle to Contract Waste Management of Washington for Recycling Processing Services

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Water, Sewer & Drainage
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
homeowners served · indirect · 70% confidence

This bill ensures continued recycling processing services for the city by authorizing a new contract with Waste Management of Washington, Inc. to replace an expiring one.

renters served · indirect · 70% confidence

This bill ensures continued recycling processing services for the city by authorizing a new contract with Waste Management of Washington, Inc. to replace an expiring one.

small‑business‑owners served · indirect · 70% confidence

This bill ensures continued recycling processing services for the city by authorizing a new contract with Waste Management of Washington, Inc. to replace an expiring one.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Rob Saka District 1 — Not on Governance and Utilities Committee
Eddie Lin District 2 — Not on Governance and Utilities Committee
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Not on Governance and Utilities Committee
Dionne Foster At Large — Not on Governance and Utilities Committee

What Was Originally Proposed

The bill proposed authorizing the General Manager and CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into a contract with Waste Management of Washington, Inc. The purpose of this agreement was to secure recycling processing services for the City of Seattle.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the General Manager and CEO of Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) to enter into a contract with Waste Management of Washington, Inc. for recycling processing services. This new agreement is intended to replace the city's existing contract with Rabanco, Ltd., which is scheduled to expire on March 31, 2027. The selection of Waste Management follows a Request for Proposals process initiated by SPU on April 1, 2025.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 16, 2026
Legislative journey
May 20 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jun 2 City Council Referred
Jun 11 Governance and Utilities Committee Pass
Jun 18 Mayor Signed
Jun 18 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Appropriating Funds for Claims (June 1–5, 2026) and Ratifying Prior Acts

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
employees‑in‑regulated‑sectors employed-by · direct · 80% confidence

This ordinance allocates approximately $73.5 million to pay for gross payroll expenses for the week of June 1 through June 5, 2026.

Votes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay specific claims and expenses incurred during the week of June 1 through June 5, 2026. Additionally, it sought to formally ratify and confirm certain prior official acts.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the appropriation of funds to pay various city claims, e-payables, and electronic financial transactions for the week of June 1 through June 5, 2026. Specifically, it allocates approximately $132.2 million for general claims and electronic transactions, as well as $73.5 million for gross payroll expenses. The bill ensures these payments are consistent with the current amended budget and ratifies related prior acts.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 16, 2026
Legislative journey
Jun 16 City Council Referred
Jun 18 Mayor Signed
Jun 18 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Seattle Council Passes Emergency Moratorium on New and Expanding Data Centers

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Land Use & Zoning
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
developers‑and‑builders regulated · direct · 100% confidence

This bill imposes a moratorium on the filing, processing, and approval of applications to establish, expand, or change the use of data centers.

license‑and‑permit‑holders regulated · direct · 90% confidence

The bill stops the city from processing or approving applications for data center permits, though existing facilities can expand their capacity by up to 20 Megavolt-Amperes (MVA).

small‑business‑owners regulated · indirect · 60% confidence

The bill allows existing data centers to expand capacity to support the data needs of local businesses while the city analyzes the economic and environmental impacts of these facilities.

Legally Recognized Populations
Populations Facing Environmental Harm Not a single Census variable — identified by layering ACS demographics over environmental-exposure data (pollution sources, air toxics, hazardous sites), the approach used by EPA's now-discontinued EJScreen and Washington's Environmental Health Disparities Map.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 Yes Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

Amendments

Member / Body Amendment Date
Lin Data Center Expansion Allowed Jun 9, 2026
Councilmember Lin Adds Sustainability Office to Data Center Workplan Jun 9, 2026

What Changed From The Original

Data Center Expansion Allowed

The amendment establishes a moratorium on new data centers in Seattle, but allows existing data centers to expand their capacity by up to 20 Megavolt-Amperes (MVA) without being subject to the moratorium. This exemption enables existing facilities to grow and support the data needs of local businesses, government entities, and institutions. The amendment requires that the existing facility be operating on the effective date of the ordinance and meet the definition of a data center to be eligible for the exemption.

Adds Sustainability Office to Data Center Workplan

The amendment establishes the Office of Sustainability and Environment as the lead agency overseeing a workplan to analyze the impacts of data centers in Seattle. It requires the Office of Sustainability and Environment to develop a framework for voluntary data center community benefits agreements by February 1, 2027, in consultation with various stakeholders. This framework may include voluntary commitments or be incorporated into land use permitting requirements, aiming to address economic and environmental concerns related to data centers.

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed establishing a formal legal definition for data centers and implementing an immediate moratorium on all new applications for their establishment, expansion, or change of use. It also outlined a work plan to address these land use and zoning issues and declared an emergency to make the changes effective immediately.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance establishes a formal definition for data centers and imposes a one-year moratorium on the filing, processing, and approval of applications for their establishment, expansion, or change of use. The measure is designed to prevent potential adverse impacts on Seattle's land use, environment, and utility infrastructure, specifically regarding energy and water reliability. During this period, the City Council has directed various city departments to execute a work plan to analyze the economic and environmental effects of data centers and develop mitigating regulations.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by City Clerk
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 9, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Populations Facing Environmental Harm
Legislative journey
May 19 City Council Referred
May 20 Land Use and Sustainability Committee Discussed
Jun 3 Land Use and Sustainability Committee Pass as amended
Jun 9 City Council Passed
Jun 11 Mayor Signed
Jun 11 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Extension of Contract Rezone and Amended Development Agreement for 5201 Rainier Ave S

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Land Use & Zoning
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
In Committee (Amendable)
City Clerk
This bill is in committee. Council members can still propose amendments.
Contact your representative
Who’s affected & how
developers‑and‑builders regulated · direct · 100% confidence

This bill extends the contract rezone for Eagle Rock Ventures and 5201 Rainier, LLC by two years and accepts an amended Property Use and Development Agreement to help them complete their project.

district‑2 sited-near · indirect · 70% confidence

This bill updates the development agreement and extends the rezone timeline for a specific property located at 5201 Rainier Avenue South.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

Amendments

Member / Body Amendment Date
No names provided Seattle Affordable Housing Expansion Jun 9, 2026

What Changed From The Original

Seattle Affordable Housing Expansion

There is no amendment text provided to summarize.

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed extending a previously approved contract rezone for a property located at 5201 Rainier Avenue South. Additionally, it sought to accept an amended Property Use and Development Agreement submitted by the applicants, Eagle Rock Ventures and 5201 Rainier, LLC.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance extends the term of a contract rezone for the property located at 5201 Rainier Avenue South by two years. It also accepts an amended Property Use and Development Agreement (PUDA) that updates specific conditions and covenants for the site's future development. These extensions are intended to allow the developers, Eagle Rock Ventures and 5201 Rainier, LLC, to complete the project following delays caused by the pandemic and macroeconomic conditions.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by City Clerk
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 9, 2026
Legislative journey
Jun 2 City Council Referred
Jun 3 Land Use and Sustainability Committee Pass
Jun 9 City Council Passed as amended

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Appropriating Funds for Claims (May 25–29, 2026) and Ratifying Prior Acts

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay specific claims incurred during the week of May 25, 2026, through May 29, 2026. Additionally, it sought to authorize those payments and formally ratify previous related actions.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the City of Seattle to pay various claims and expenditures incurred during the week of May 25, 2026, through May 29, 2026. The total approved amount is $143,780,884.29, which covers payroll expenses, bills, and other financial obligations. These payments are distributed across electronic financial transactions (EFT), mechanical warrants, and e-payables. The legislation ensures these expenditures remain consistent with the city's current amended budget.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 9, 2026
Legislative journey
Jun 9 City Council Referred
Jun 9 City Council Passed
Jun 12 Mayor Signed
Jun 12 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

2026 Stormwater Code Update: Strengthening Treatment Standards and Permit Compliance

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Water, Sewer & Drainage
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
developers‑and‑builders regulated · direct · 90% confidence

This bill imposes stricter stormwater treatment and infiltration standards for development activities. It also expands the definition of 'new hard surface' to include paving over vegetation or upgrading existing surfaces.

license‑and‑permit‑holders regulated · direct · 80% confidence

This bill updates the stormwater control requirements and clarifies the review thresholds and vesting requirements for those seeking permits.

homeowners regulated · indirect · 60% confidence

This bill updates the rules for creating or converting hard surfaces, such as paving over vegetation, which affects how stormwater is managed on properties.

Legally Recognized Populations
Populations Facing Environmental Harm Not a single Census variable — identified by layering ACS demographics over environmental-exposure data (pollution sources, air toxics, hazardous sites), the approach used by EPA's now-discontinued EJScreen and Washington's Environmental Health Disparities Map.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 Yes Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

Amendments

Member / Body Amendment Date
Hollingsworth Stormwater Code Technical Corrections May 9, 2026
Hollingsworth Stormwater Code Update Amendment May 9, 2026
JH, DJ, BK, MR, DS, CP Hollingsworth Stormwater Code Update Amendment May 19, 2026

What Changed From The Original

Stormwater Code Technical Corrections

The amendment establishes definitions for terms such as "aquatic life use" and "native vegetation" in the Seattle Municipal Code, and requires specific language and formatting changes to be made to the code. It also clarifies the definition of "new hard surface" to include the creation or conversion of hard surfaces, such as paving over vegetation or upgrading existing surfaces. Additionally, the amendment provides examples of what constitutes a "new hard surface" to help guide interpretation and application of the code.

Stormwater Code Update Amendment

The amendment establishes the City's intent to continue advocating for the prohibition of harmful chemicals, such as 6PPD, in tire sales statewide. It requires the City to collaborate with researchers on the role of trees in stormwater management and to consider the best available science, effective techniques, and climate resilience in future Stormwater Code updates. The amendment also sets a framework for the City to incorporate effective stormwater management techniques from other jurisdictions into its environmental protections.

Stormwater Code Update Amendment

The amendment establishes additional recitals that highlight the City's advocacy and intent for future updates to the Stormwater Code. It requires the inclusion of language that outlines the City's goals and priorities for stormwater management, providing a framework for future code updates. This addition aims to ensure the City's stormwater policies align with its advocacy efforts and intentions.

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed updating the 2026 Stormwater Code to strengthen treatment and infiltration standards for development, roadways, utilities, and maintenance. Its primary goal was to ensure the City remains compliant with the State Department of Ecology's 2024-2029 Phase 1 Municipal Stormwater Permit. Additionally, the bill sought to clarify review thresholds and vesting requirements across several chapters of the Seattle Municipal Code.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance updates the 2026 Stormwater Code to strengthen treatment and infiltration standards for development, roadways, utilities, and maintenance activities. Its primary purpose is to ensure the City of Seattle remains in compliance with the 2024-2029 Phase 1 Municipal Stormwater Permit issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology. Additionally, the bill clarifies vesting and review thresholds while amending several chapters of the Seattle Municipal Code to better protect local water bodies from urban runoff and pollutants.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 2, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Populations Facing Environmental Harm
Legislative journey
Mar 18 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Mar 31 City Council Referred
Apr 9 Governance and Utilities Committee Discussed
May 14 Governance and Utilities Committee Pass as amended
Jun 2 City Council Passed as amended
Jun 4 Mayor Signed
Jun 4 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance to Expand Housing Supply and Update Zoning Standards Across Multiple Neighborhoods

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Land Use & Zoning
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
developers‑and‑builders regulated · direct · 90% confidence

This bill removes regulatory barriers for modular, mass timber, and passive house construction and increases height limits in eligible residential areas.

renters served · indirect · 80% confidence

The bill increases the overall housing supply by rezoning specific neighborhoods and making it easier to convert commercial spaces into housing.

homeowners regulated · direct · 70% confidence

This bill rezones specific areas in the University District, Fremont, Madison/Miller, Rainier Beach, and Downtown, and increases height limits in eligible residential areas.

landlords regulated · direct · 70% confidence

The bill simplifies the process for converting existing commercial spaces into residential housing.

district‑1 represented-by · indirect · 60% confidence

This bill rezones specific areas in the Downtown and Fremont neighborhoods to increase housing supply and support multi-purpose redevelopment.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed rezoning specific areas across several Seattle neighborhoods to increase the overall housing supply and support multi-purpose redevelopment. It aimed to remove regulatory barriers for sustainable construction methods—such as mass timber and modular building—and simplify the conversion of commercial spaces into residential housing. Additionally, the bill sought to provide incentives for developing community-serving uses alongside new housing projects.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance seeks to increase Seattle's housing supply and affordability by rezoning specific areas in the University District, Fremont, Madison/Miller, Rainier Beach, and Downtown. It modifies development standards to remove regulatory barriers for modular, mass timber, and passive house construction, while making it easier to convert commercial spaces into housing. Additionally, the bill introduces height limit increases in eligible residential areas and provides incentives for the development of community-serving and multi-purpose uses.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 2, 2026
Legislative journey
Mar 25 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Apr 14 City Council Referred
Apr 15 Land Use and Sustainability Committee Discussed
May 20 Land Use and Sustainability Committee Pass
Jun 2 City Council Passed
Jun 4 Mayor Signed
Jun 4 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance for Salmon Habitat Property Acquisitions and State Land Transfers

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Environment & Climate
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
Population Density by District
Legally Recognized Populations
Tribal Members & Treaty Rights Holders Enrolled members of federally recognized tribes and holders of treaty-reserved rights — a legal/political status set by tribal governments and treaties, not a Census variable. Self-identified American Indian / Alaska Native race (ACS Table B02001) is the closest, imperfect proxy.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed that Seattle City Light accept several parcels of land across King and Skagit counties for the purpose of protecting salmonid habitats. It further proposed declaring these lands surplus to the city's utility needs so they could be transferred to the State of Washington for salmon recovery and conservation.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes Seattle City Light to accept several property deeds in King and Skagit Counties specifically for the purpose of protecting salmonid habitats. It ratifies the use of Salmon Recovery Funding Board grants to acquire these lands and places the properties under the jurisdiction of the City Light Department. Additionally, the bill declares certain property rights as surplus and ratifies the transfer of "Deeds of Right" for several of these properties to the State of Washington for ongoing salmon recovery and conservation.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 2, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Tribal Members And Treaty Rights Holders
Legislative journey
Mar 25 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Apr 21 City Council Referred
May 20 Parks and City Light Committee Pass
Jun 2 City Council Passed
Jun 4 Mayor Signed
Jun 4 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

City Light to Grant Easement to Puget Sound Energy for Fair Market Value

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
City Property & Real Estate
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — No
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

The bill proposed authorizing the General Manager and CEO of Seattle City Light to grant an easement to Puget Sound Energy over a portion of city-owned property. In exchange for this access, the city would accept payment equal to the fair market value of the easement.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the General Manager and CEO of Seattle City Light to grant a perpetual, non-exclusive easement to Puget Sound Energy (PSE) for a portion of city-owned property in Bellevue, Washington. The easement, covering approximately 900 square feet of Parcel 0924059143, allows PSE to install, construct, and maintain underground gas transmission and distribution facilities to power a generator. In exchange for this access, the City of Seattle will accept payment based on the fair market value of the easement.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 2, 2026
Legislative journey
Apr 22 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
May 5 City Council Referred
May 20 Parks and City Light Committee Pass
Jun 2 City Council Passed
Jun 4 Mayor Signed
Jun 4 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

City Light to Grant Easement to King County for Fair Market Value

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Transportation & Streets
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
wheelchair‑and‑mobility‑device‑users served · direct · 100% confidence

This bill allows King County to install ADA-compliant curb ramps and sidewalk improvements on a portion of city-owned property. These specific infrastructure upgrades directly improve accessibility for people using mobility devices.

pedestrians served · direct · 90% confidence

This bill enables the installation of sidewalk improvements and curb ramps near 68th Ave S. These changes provide direct infrastructure benefits for people walking in the area.

Population Density by District
Legally Recognized Populations
People with Disabilities People reporting serious difficulty in at least one of six Census domains: hearing, vision, cognitive, ambulatory, self-care, or independent living (ACS disability questions). Protected under the ADA / Section 504, not Title VI.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

The bill proposed authorizing the General Manager and CEO of Seattle City Light to grant an easement to King County over a portion of city-owned property. In exchange for this access, the city would accept payment equal to the fair market value of the easement.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the Seattle City Light Department to grant a 65-square-foot easement to King County on a property located near 68th Ave S in unincorporated King County. The easement allows the county to install and maintain ADA-compliant curb ramps and sidewalk improvements as part of a roadway project. In exchange for this access, the City of Seattle will accept payment for the fair market value of the easement.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 2, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
People With Disabilities
Legislative journey
Apr 22 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
May 5 City Council Referred
May 20 Parks and City Light Committee Pass
Jun 2 City Council Passed
Jun 4 Mayor Signed
Jun 4 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Approving Public Benefit Tax Classification for 4807 SW 54th Street

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Taxes & Revenue
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
In Committee (Amendable)
City Clerk
This bill is in committee. Council members can still propose amendments.
Contact your representative
Who’s affected & how
nonprofit‑service‑providers taxed · direct · 100% confidence

This bill allows the nonprofit organization GROW, Inc. to be taxed based on the property's actual use as a community garden rather than its market value. This classification under the King County Public Benefit Rating System reduces the property taxes for the organization.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the classification of a specific property located at 4807 SW 54th Street under the King County Public Benefit Rating System. If approved, this designation would allow the property to qualify for current use taxation, which typically reduces property taxes for land used for public benefit.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance approves an application for "current use" taxation for a 0.13-acre property located at 4807 SW 54th Street, known as Beyer's Bulldog Garden. By classifying the land under the King County Public Benefit Rating System (PBRS), the property will be taxed based on its actual use as a community garden rather than its "highest and best use" market value. This tax incentive is designed to encourage the nonprofit organization GROW, Inc. to maintain the site as a public open space.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by City Clerk
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 2, 2026
Legislative journey
May 19 City Council Referred
May 20 Parks and City Light Committee Pass
Jun 2 City Council Passed

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Seattle to Authorize 10-Year Lease of Madison Beach Bathhouse to Cooperative Preschool

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Parks, Open Space & Recreation
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
parents‑of‑young‑children served · direct · 90% confidence

This bill allows the Madison Park Cooperative Preschool to manage the Madison Beach Park Bathhouse to provide early childhood education.

nonprofit‑service‑providers served · direct · 80% confidence

This bill authorizes a ten-year contract for the Madison Park Cooperative Preschool to operate and manage a City-owned facility.

district‑4 represented-by · indirect · 70% confidence

This bill enables the continued use of the Madison Beach Park Bathhouse for community programming and education within the district.

k12‑families served · indirect · 60% confidence

This bill provides early childhood education and community programming through the preschool's management of the bathhouse facility.

Population Density by District
Legally Recognized Populations
Youth & Children People under age 18, per standard Census Bureau age-bracket tables. Households with Children Under 18 Households — family or non-family — with at least one person under 18 living there (ACS Table B11005). Not a legally protected category; included because bills affecting schools, childcare, or family housing tend to matter most to households in this situation. Households with a Child Under 6 Family households with at least one own child under age 6 (ACS Table B11003). The universe is total families, not all households — this table doesn't capture the rare non-family household raising a young child. Not a legally protected category; a narrower cut of the households-with-children-under-18 population, for bills specifically about early-childhood impact (childcare, pre-K, infant/toddler services).

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

The bill originally proposed authorizing the Superintendent of Seattle Parks and Recreation to enter into a ten-year contract with The Madison Park Cooperative Preschool. This agreement would allow the preschool to operate and manage the Madison Beach Park Bathhouse.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the Superintendent of Seattle Parks and Recreation to enter into a ten-year contract with the Madison Park Cooperative Preschool (MPCP). Under this agreement, MPCP will operate and manage the City-owned Madison Beach Park Bathhouse to provide early childhood education and community programming. This legislation continues a long-standing partnership between the City and the preschool, which was the sole respondent to a recent Letter of Interest for the facility's use.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 2, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Youth And Children Households With Children Under 18 Households With A Child Under 6
Legislative journey
May 6 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
May 19 City Council Referred
May 20 Parks and City Light Committee Pass
Jun 2 City Council Passed
Jun 4 Mayor Signed
Jun 4 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Seattle to Grant 10-Year Shelterhouse Contract to Victory Heights Cooperative Preschool

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Parks, Open Space & Recreation
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
parents‑of‑young‑children served · direct · 100% confidence

This bill allows Victory Heights Cooperative Preschool to continue providing early childhood education programs at the Victory Heights Shelterhouse.

nonprofit‑service‑providers funded · direct · 100% confidence

The bill authorizes a $280,800 contract for the nonprofit Victory Heights Cooperative Preschool to operate and manage the city-owned shelterhouse.

k12‑families served · indirect · 70% confidence

This bill enables the preschool to provide community events and early childhood education at the Victory Heights Shelterhouse.

district‑4 represented-by · indirect · 60% confidence

This bill authorizes the management of the Victory Heights Shelterhouse located at 1747 NE 106th Street.

Population Density by District
Legally Recognized Populations
Youth & Children People under age 18, per standard Census Bureau age-bracket tables. Households with Children Under 18 Households — family or non-family — with at least one person under 18 living there (ACS Table B11005). Not a legally protected category; included because bills affecting schools, childcare, or family housing tend to matter most to households in this situation. Households with a Child Under 6 Family households with at least one own child under age 6 (ACS Table B11003). The universe is total families, not all households — this table doesn't capture the rare non-family household raising a young child. Not a legally protected category; a narrower cut of the households-with-children-under-18 population, for bills specifically about early-childhood impact (childcare, pre-K, infant/toddler services).

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

The bill proposed authorizing the Superintendent of Seattle Parks and Recreation to enter into a ten-year contract with Victory Heights Cooperative Preschool. This agreement would allow the preschool to operate and manage the Victory Heights Shelterhouse located at 1747 NE 106th Street.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the Superintendent of Seattle Parks and Recreation to enter into a ten-year contract with Victory Heights Cooperative Preschool (VHCP). Under this agreement, the nonprofit organization will operate and manage the city-owned Victory Heights Shelterhouse located at 1747 NE 106th Street. The contract, valued at $280,800, allows VHCP to continue providing early childhood education programs and community events at the facility.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 2, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Youth And Children Households With Children Under 18 Households With A Child Under 6
Legislative journey
May 6 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
May 19 City Council Referred
May 20 Parks and City Light Committee Pass
Jun 2 City Council Passed
Jun 4 Mayor Signed
Jun 4 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Approving Claims Payment (May 11–15, 2026) and Ratifying Prior Acts

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay specific claims and bills incurred during the week of May 11, 2026, through May 15, 2026. Additionally, it sought to ratify and confirm certain prior official acts.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the City of Seattle to pay outstanding claims and payroll expenses for the week of May 11, 2026, through May 15, 2026. In accordance with state law, the bill appropriates a total of approximately $82 million to cover mechanical warrants, e-payables, and electronic financial transactions. These payments are approved based on the remaining appropriations available in the city's current amended budget.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 2, 2026
Legislative journey
Jun 2 City Council Referred
Jun 2 City Council Passed
Jun 4 Mayor Signed
Jun 4 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Appropriating Funds for Claims (May 18–22, 2026) and Ratifying Prior Acts

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
employees‑in‑regulated‑sectors employed-by · direct · 90% confidence

This bill allocates $74,022,397.36 specifically to pay gross payroll expenses ending May 19, 2026.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay specific claims incurred during the week of May 18, 2026, through May 22, 2026. Additionally, it sought to authorize those payments and formally ratify previous related actions.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the appropriation and payment of funds for city claims and payroll for the week of May 18, 2026, through May 22, 2026. It approves a total of $161,313,377.66, which includes specific allocations for general claims, e-payables, and electronic financial transactions. Additionally, the bill allocates $74,022,397.36 specifically for gross payroll expenses ending May 19, 2026.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted June 2, 2026
Legislative journey
Jun 2 City Council Referred
Jun 2 City Council Passed
Jun 4 Mayor Signed
Jun 4 Mayor Returned

Council Bill Referred Referred from Council to Committee

Seattle Ordinance to Expand Transitional Encampment Capacity and Update Zoning CodesCompleteness: 4/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

Next step: Next: Full Council vote

Policy Area
Homelessness & Shelter
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
In Committee (Amendable)
Land Use and Sustainability Committee
This bill is in committee. Council members can still propose amendments.
Contact your representative
Who’s affected & how
people‑experiencing‑homelessness served · direct · 100% confidence

This bill expands the capacity and locations where transitional encampments can be established, providing more available spaces for people to stay.

homeowners sited-near · indirect · 80% confidence

The bill increases the number of transitional encampments in neighborhoods while requiring larger sites to implement public safety plans and Good Neighbor Agreements to address community concerns.

nonprofit‑service‑providers regulated · direct · 80% confidence

Operators of city-funded encampments with over 100 occupants must now meet mandatory 24-hour staffing minimums, develop comprehensive safety plans, and maintain specific case management ratios.

renters sited-near · indirect · 70% confidence

The bill increases the capacity of transitional encampments in the city and mandates that larger sites establish physical boundaries and communication protocols for the surrounding community.

small‑business‑owners sited-near · indirect · 70% confidence

The bill expands where transitional encampments can be located and requires larger sites to enter into Good Neighbor Agreements that define operator responsibilities and behavioral standards.

Population Density by District
Legally Recognized Populations
Low-Income Populations People living below the federal poverty threshold, based on household income and family size (ACS Table S1701 / B17001).

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 Yes Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 Yes Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large Yes Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes
Rob Saka District 1 — Not on Land Use and Sustainability Committee
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Not on Land Use and Sustainability Committee
Debora Juarez District 5 — Not on Land Use and Sustainability Committee
Robert Kettle District 7 — Not on Land Use and Sustainability Committee

Amendments

Member / Body Amendment Date
Councilmember Foster, Councilmember Juarez Public Safety Plan Requirements for Large Transitional Encampments May 9, 2026
Councilmember Hollingsworth Require Good Neighbor Agreements for Transitional Encampments May 9, 2026
Councilmember Hollingsworth Require Good Neighbor Agreements for transitional encampments May 9, 2026
Councilmember Rinck Staffing Minimums for Large Transitional Encampments May 9, 2026
Councilmember Rinck Case Management Ratios for Large Transitional Encampments May 9, 2026
Councilmember Strauss Dividing Large Transitional Encampments into Smaller Neighborhoods May 9, 2026
Councilmember Rivera Authority to Negotiate Operating Requirements for Transitional Encampments May 19, 2026
Councilmember Rivera Overnight Security Requirement for Large Transitional Encampments May 19, 2026
Councilmember Strauss Require Neighborhood Divisions for Large Transitional Encampments May 19, 2026
Foster, Juarez, Hollingsworth, Rinck, Strauss Shelter Permit and Staffing Requirements Amendments May 9, 2026

What Changed From The Original

Public Safety Plan Requirements for Large Transitional Encampments

This amendment requires city-funded transitional encampments with more than 100 occupants to develop a comprehensive public safety plan that includes a Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) assessment and strict protocols for reporting critical incidents and 911 data to the Mayor’s Office. Additionally, it establishes a Community Advisory Committee to provide oversight and advise on the implementation of these safety plans to address neighborhood concerns.

Require Good Neighbor Agreements for Transitional Encampments

This amendment requires city-funded transitional encampments with more than 100 occupants to establish a Good Neighbor Agreement (GNA) that defines physical boundaries and operator responsibilities. The GNA must mandate specific public safety and communication protocols, including a 72-hour response time for community concerns, a commitment to report crimes to the Seattle Police Department, and the publication of behavioral standards for residents.

Require Good Neighbor Agreements for transitional encampments

This amendment requires city-funded transitional encampments with more than 100 occupants to enter into a Good Neighbor Agreement (GNA) upon establishment or expansion. The GNA must establish clear physical boundaries and mandate specific communication and safety protocols, including a designated point of contact for community concerns and a commitment to attend regular neighborhood meetings. Additionally, the agreement must define the operator's responsibilities and set behavioral standards for encampment residents and guests.

Staffing Minimums for Large Transitional Encampments

This amendment establishes mandatory staffing minimums for city-funded transitional encampments that are newly created or expanded to house more than 100 occupants. It requires these operators to maintain at least two staff members on-site 24 hours a day for every day the encampment is in operation.

Case Management Ratios for Large Transitional Encampments

This amendment establishes a staffing goal for city-funded operators of new or expanded transitional encampments with more than 100 occupants. It requires these operators to strive toward providing intensive case management, specifically encouraging a ratio of at least one case manager for every 15 occupants with high-acuity needs.

Dividing Large Transitional Encampments into Smaller Neighborhoods

This amendment requires operators of city-funded transitional encampments with over 100 units to divide the site into self-contained neighborhoods with controlled access. Each neighborhood is generally limited to 50 micro-modular structures or vehicles, though the Human Services Department Director may increase this limit to 60 based on specific site characteristics.

Authority to Negotiate Operating Requirements for Transitional Encampments

This amendment requires city-funded transitional encampments with over 100 occupants to implement a comprehensive public safety plan, maintain 24-hour on-site staffing, and enter into a Good Neighbor Agreement with the community. It establishes mandates for crime prevention assessments, detailed incident reporting to the Mayor's Office, and the provision of intensive case management for high-acuity residents. Additionally, it grants the City authority to negotiate further operating requirements for encampments located near schools or existing transitional sites.

Overnight Security Requirement for Large Transitional Encampments

This amendment requires city-funded transitional encampments with more than 100 occupants to provide a comprehensive public safety plan, enter into a Good Neighbor Agreement with the community, and maintain two staff members on-site 24 hours a day. Additionally, operators must conduct environmental design assessments for crime prevention, report critical safety incidents to the Mayor’s Office, and strive to provide intensive case management for high-acuity residents.

Require Neighborhood Divisions for Large Transitional Encampments

This amendment requires city-funded transitional encampments with over 100 units to be organized into smaller neighborhoods of generally no more than 50 shelter units. Operators of these larger sites must implement a comprehensive public safety plan, maintain 24-hour on-site staffing, and enter into a Good Neighbor Agreement to establish behavioral standards and community communication protocols. Additionally, operators are encouraged to provide intensive case management for high-acuity residents to support their transition.

Shelter Permit and Staffing Requirements Amendments

This legislation establishes new operational mandates for shelters, including the requirement of a Public Safety Plan to obtain a permit and the execution of Good Neighbor Agreements. Additionally, it mandates specific staffing minimums and case management ratios to ensure standardized levels of oversight and support.

What Was Originally ProposedCompleteness: 2/5
Faithfulness: 4/5

This ordinance proposed adopting interim land use and zoning provisions to increase the capacity of transitional encampments. It sought to achieve this by amending specific sections of the Seattle Municipal Code to expand where and how these encampments could be established.

What The Final Text DoesCompleteness: 3/5
Faithfulness: 3/5

This ordinance seeks to address the homelessness crisis by expanding the capacity of transitional encampments, such as tiny house villages and microshelters. It proposes increasing the citywide census limit for these sites from 100 people to 150, with the possibility of one site hosting up to 250 people. By amending the Seattle Municipal Code, the bill aims to utilize public land more efficiently to provide rapid, temporary shelter for the growing unsheltered population.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee Land Use and Sustainability Committee
Transmitted May 19, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Low Income Populations
Legislative journey
Mar 4 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Apr 14 City Council Referred
Apr 15 Land Use and Sustainability Committee Discussed
May 6 Land Use and Sustainability Committee Pass as amended

Council Bill Referred Referred from Council to Committee

Ordinance Designating the Woodin House as a Seattle Historical LandmarkCompleteness: 5/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

Next step: Next: Full Council vote

Policy Area
Land Use & Zoning
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
In Committee (Amendable)
Libraries, Education, and Neighborhoods Committee
This bill is in committee. Council members can still propose amendments.
Contact your representative
Who’s affected & how
homeowners regulated · direct · 90% confidence

This bill imposes preservation controls on the Woodin House by designating it as a Seattle historic landmark. These controls regulate the property to protect its architectural and historical significance.

developers‑and‑builders regulated · direct · 70% confidence

This bill imposes preservation controls on the Woodin House by adding it to the Table of Historical Landmarks in the Seattle Municipal Code. These controls regulate the site to ensure its architectural and historical significance is protected.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes
Rob Saka District 1 — Not on Libraries, Education, and Neighborhoods Committee
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Not on Libraries, Education, and Neighborhoods Committee
Debora Juarez District 5 — Not on Libraries, Education, and Neighborhoods Committee
Dan Strauss District 6 — Not on Libraries, Education, and Neighborhoods Committee
Robert Kettle District 7 — Not on Libraries, Education, and Neighborhoods Committee

What Was Originally ProposedCompleteness: 5/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

This ordinance proposed imposing historic preservation controls on the Woodin House, a site designated as a landmark by the Landmarks Preservation Board. Additionally, it sought to officially add the property to the Table of Historical Landmarks within the Seattle Municipal Code.

What The Final Text DoesCompleteness: 4/5
Faithfulness: 3/5

This ordinance officially designates the Woodin House, located at 5801 Corson Avenue S in Georgetown, as a Seattle historic landmark. By adding the property to the Table of Historical Landmarks in the Seattle Municipal Code, the bill imposes preservation controls to protect the site's architectural and historical significance. This action follows the approval and nomination of the property by the Landmarks Preservation Board in late 2024.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Department of Neighborhoods
Assigned committee Libraries, Education, and Neighborhoods Committee
Transmitted May 19, 2026
Legislative journey
Jun 18 Department of Neighborhoods Legislation transmitted to Council
Apr 14 City Council Referred
May 13 Libraries, Education, and Neighborhoods Committee Pass

Council Bill Referred Referred from Council to Committee

Amending SPU and King County Agreement for South Park Flood Preparedness ProgramCompleteness: 5/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

Next step: Next: Full Council vote

Policy Area
Water, Sewer & Drainage
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
In Committee (Amendable)
Governance and Utilities Committee
This bill is in committee. Council members can still propose amendments.
Contact your representative
Who’s affected & how
homeowners served · direct · 80% confidence

This bill increases funding for the South Park Interim Flooding Preparedness and Response Program to acquire pumps and equipment to address repetitive flooding in the neighborhood.

renters served · direct · 80% confidence

This bill provides additional funding for flood preparedness, response measures, and community education to address repetitive flooding in the South Park neighborhood.

small‑business‑owners served · direct · 70% confidence

This bill authorizes more funding for the acquisition of equipment and supplies to implement flood response measures in the South Park neighborhood.

district‑1 represented-by · indirect · 60% confidence

This bill authorizes the City to secure additional funding from the King County Flood Control Zone District for flood preparedness efforts in the South Park neighborhood.

Legally Recognized Populations
Populations Facing Environmental Harm Not a single Census variable — identified by layering ACS demographics over environmental-exposure data (pollution sources, air toxics, hazardous sites), the approach used by EPA's now-discontinued EJScreen and Washington's Environmental Health Disparities Map.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Rob Saka District 1 — Not on Governance and Utilities Committee
Eddie Lin District 2 — Not on Governance and Utilities Committee
Dan Strauss District 6 — Not on Governance and Utilities Committee
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Not on Governance and Utilities Committee
Dionne Foster At Large — Not on Governance and Utilities Committee

What Was Originally ProposedCompleteness: 5/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

This ordinance proposed authorizing the General Manager of Seattle Public Utilities to sign an amendment to an interlocal agreement with the King County Flood Control Zone District. The agreement specifically concerns the South Park Interim Flooding Preparedness and Response Program.

What The Final Text DoesCompleteness: 4/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

This ordinance authorizes the General Manager and CEO of Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) to execute and amend an interlocal agreement with the King County Flood Control Zone District. The agreement supports the South Park Interim Flooding Preparedness and Response Program, which was created to address repetitive flooding in the South Park neighborhood. Specifically, the legislation allows SPU to secure additional funding and acquire equipment to enhance flood preparedness and response efforts.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee Governance and Utilities Committee
Transmitted May 19, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Populations Facing Environmental Harm
Legislative journey
Apr 15 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Apr 28 City Council Referred
May 14 Governance and Utilities Committee Pass

Council Bill Referred Referred from Council to Committee

Ordinance Appropriating Funds for Claims (May 4–8, 2026) and Ratifying Prior ActsCompleteness: 5/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

Next step: Next: Full Council vote

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Who’s affected & how
employees‑in‑regulated‑sectors employed-by · direct · 90% confidence

This bill allocates over $76 million to the City General Salary Fund to pay gross payrolls ending May 5, 2026.

Votes

What Was Originally ProposedCompleteness: 5/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay specific claims and expenses incurred during the week of May 4, 2026, through May 8, 2026. Additionally, it sought to formally ratify and confirm certain prior official acts.

What The Final Text DoesCompleteness: 2/5
Faithfulness: 2/5

This ordinance appropriates $130,293,970.50 to pay various city claims and payroll expenses for the week of May 4, 2026, through May 8, 2026. The funds cover a combination of mechanical warrants, e-payables, and electronic financial transactions for city departments. Additionally, it specifically allocates over $76 million to the City General Salary Fund to cover gross payrolls ending May 5, 2026.

Population density maps use the ACS 2023 5-Year Estimates (2019-2023), tables B01001, B02001, B03002, B11003, B11005, B13002, B16002, B17001, B18101, retrieved 2026-09-24. Council district boundaries: seattleio/seattle-boundaries-data (community-maintained, not an official City of Seattle GIS source). Aggregation methodology Census tract estimates apportioned to City Council districts by area-weighted overlay: each tract's counts are split across districts in proportion to the share of the tract's land area falling in each district, then summed per district. District boundaries: seattleio/seattle-boundaries-data (community-maintained, not an official City of Seattle GIS source). Tract boundaries: US Census Bureau TIGER/Line cartographic boundary files, 2023 vintage. Citywide figures are queried directly at the Seattle place level, not resummed from districts. ACS 5-year estimates carry sampling error that can be substantial at the tract level; treat percentages as estimates, not precise counts.