Learn: A Proof of Concept Seattle Legislative Plain-Text Translator

Previous Legislation
Jan 13 – Mar 24, 2026

Learn•Connect•Engage

Council Bill Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Approving Claims Payments for March 9–13, 2026Completeness: 5/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Who’s affected & how
employees‑in‑regulated‑sectors employed-by · direct · 90% confidence

This ordinance authorizes approximately $73.7 million for gross payroll to pay city payroll obligations for the week of March 9 through March 13, 2026.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally ProposedCompleteness: 5/5
Faithfulness: 5/5

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay specific claims and expenses incurred during the week of March 9 through March 13, 2026. Additionally, it sought to ratify and confirm certain prior official acts related to these payments.

What The Final Text DoesCompleteness: 4/5
Faithfulness: 4/5

This ordinance authorizes the appropriation of funds to pay various city claims and payroll obligations for the week of March 9 through March 13, 2026. It approves over $76 million for general claims, e-payables, and electronic financial transactions, as well as approximately $73.7 million for gross payroll. These payments are processed through the City's PeopleSoft system and General Salary Fund in accordance with state law.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee Full Council
Transmitted March 24, 2026
Legislative journey
Mar 24 City Council Referred
Mar 24 City Council Passed

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Seattle Bans Civil Immigration Enforcement Staging on City-Owned Property

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Civil Rights & Anti-Discrimination
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
nonprofit‑service‑providers served · indirect · 60% confidence

This bill prohibits federal immigration enforcement from using city-owned properties that are used to serve essential services to vulnerable populations as staging areas for personnel and equipment.

Population Density by District
Legally Recognized Populations
Racial or Ethnic Minorities People identifying as a race or ethnicity other than non-Hispanic White alone (Census race / Hispanic-origin categories, ACS Table B03002) — the population Title VI (race, color, national origin) protects.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 Yes Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 Yes Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Not on Public Safety Committee
Dan Strauss District 6 — Not on Public Safety Committee
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Not on Public Safety Committee
Dionne Foster At Large — Not on Public Safety Committee

Amendments

Member / Body Amendment Date
Councilmember Kettle Amendment 1 restricts civil immigration enforcement Mar 4, 2026
Councilmember Lin Councilmember Foster Amendment to CB 121164 expands civil immigration enforcement staging to diverse city-owned properties. Mar 9, 2026

What Changed From The Original

Amendment 1 restricts civil immigration enforcement

The amendment prohibits the use of city-owned property for civil immigration enforcement staging, specifically restricting actions to assemble, mobilize, or deploy personnel, vehicles, or equipment for those operations, or for surveillance or logistical coordination. The change aligns the bill language with Councilmember Kettle's original intent, ensuring the prohibition does not extend to lawful uses of city-owned property for purposes unrelated to civil immigration enforcement staging.

Amendment to CB 121164 expands civil immigration enforcement staging to diverse city-owned properties.

The amendment prohibits civil immigration enforcement staging on city-owned properties that are used to serve essential services to vulnerable populations, and eliminates the requirement for the City to own and control a property to prohibit such staging. It expands the list of properties where the City can prohibit staging, including those managed by partnerships with other governments and those used for providing services to residents and vulnerable populations.

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed prohibiting civil immigration enforcement agencies from using any city-owned or controlled real property as staging areas. To implement this, the bill sought to add a new chapter (14.125) to the Seattle Municipal Code.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance establishes Chapter 14.125 of the Seattle Municipal Code to prohibit the use of City-owned and controlled real property for the staging of federal civil immigration enforcement operations. Specifically, it bars federal authorities from using these properties to assemble, mobilize, or deploy personnel, vehicles, and equipment. The legislation is designed to ensure that City resources are not commandeered for immigration enforcement activities, to the extent permitted by law.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by City Clerk
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted March 17, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Racial Or Ethnic Minorities
Legislative journey
Feb 17 City Council Referred
Feb 24 Public Safety Committee Discussed
Mar 10 Public Safety Committee Pass as amended
Mar 23 Mayor Signed
Mar 23 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Seattle Ordinance to Sell Surplus SPU Property in SeaTac to King County Water District 125

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
City Property & Real Estate
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Rob Saka District 1 — Not on Governance and Utilities Committee
Eddie Lin District 2 — Not on Governance and Utilities Committee
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Not on Governance and Utilities Committee
Debora Juarez District 5 — Not on Governance and Utilities Committee
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Not on Governance and Utilities Committee
Dionne Foster At Large — Not on Governance and Utilities Committee

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed declaring a specific piece of real property in SeaTac, owned by Seattle Public Utilities, as surplus to the city's needs. It authorized the General Manager and CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to execute the sale of this property to King County Water District 125.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance declares a specific parcel of land in SeaTac (King County Parcel Number 1623049405) to be surplus to the City of Seattle's needs. It authorizes the General Manager of Seattle Public Utilities to execute the necessary documents to sell this property to King County Water District 125. Based on related documents, the sale price for the property is $280,200.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted March 17, 2026
Legislative journey
Feb 3 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Feb 17 City Council Referred
Mar 12 Governance and Utilities Committee Pass
Mar 23 Mayor Signed
Mar 23 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Appropriating Funds for Claims: March 2–6, 2026

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.

Votes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay specific claims and expenses incurred during the week of March 2, 2026, through March 6, 2026. Additionally, it sought to formally ratify and confirm certain prior official acts.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the payment of $214,383,801.67 to cover various city claims and expenditures for the week of March 2 through March 6, 2026. The total includes funds distributed via electronic financial transactions, mechanical warrants, and e-payables. Prepared weekly by the City Treasury, the bill ensures these payments are consistent with the city's current amended budget. Additionally, the legislation ratifies and confirms certain prior acts related to these financial transactions.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted March 17, 2026
Legislative journey
Mar 17 City Council Referred
Mar 23 Mayor Signed
Mar 23 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

City Ordinance: Acceptance of 61 Electrical Distribution Easements for City Light Department

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Electricity & Energy
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
homeowners sited-near · direct · 60% confidence

This bill allows Seattle City Light to place electrical equipment, such as poles and vaults, or run conductors on private property through sixty-one easements.

landlords sited-near · direct · 60% confidence

This bill allows Seattle City Light to place electrical equipment, such as poles and vaults, or run conductors on private property through sixty-one easements.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

The bill proposed that the City of Seattle accept sixty-one easements for electrical distribution rights within King County. These easements would be placed under the formal jurisdiction of the City Light Department.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the City of Seattle to formally accept sixty-one easements for electrical distribution rights located within King County. These easements allow Seattle City Light to run conductors or place service equipment, such as poles and vaults, on private property to ensure safe and efficient electrical service. By passing this legislation, the City complies with the Seattle City Charter's requirement that the acquisition of real property interests be conducted via ordinance. Once accepted, these easements are placed under the direct jurisdiction of the City Light Department.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee Full Council
Transmitted March 10, 2026
Legislative journey
Feb 11 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Feb 24 City Council Referred
Mar 4 Parks and City Light Committee Pass
Mar 10 City Council Passed
Mar 12 Mayor Signed
Mar 12 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

City Ordinance: Acceptance of 150 Electrical Distribution Easements for City Light Department

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Electricity & Energy
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
developers‑and‑builders regulated · direct · 70% confidence

This bill allows the City Light Department to accept 150 easements incorporated into short plats, lot boundary adjustments, and unit lot subdivisions. This provides a formal process for these developments to secure the legal right for electrical services on their properties.

homeowners sited-near · indirect · 60% confidence

By placing 150 electrical distribution easements under City Light jurisdiction, this bill ensures the city can operate and maintain electrical services on those properties.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed that the City Light Department accept 150 easements for electrical distribution within King County. Once accepted, these easements would be placed under the formal jurisdiction of the City Light Department.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the Seattle City Light Department to accept 150 easements for electrical distribution within King County. These easements, which are incorporated into short plats, lot boundary adjustments, and unit lot subdivisions, ensure that the city has the legal right to place, operate, and maintain electrical services on these properties. Once accepted, these easements will fall under the formal jurisdiction of the City Light Department.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee Full Council
Transmitted March 10, 2026
Legislative journey
Feb 11 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Feb 24 City Council Referred
Mar 4 Parks and City Light Committee Pass
Mar 10 City Council Passed
Mar 12 Mayor Signed
Mar 12 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Seattle Imposes Emergency Moratorium on New or Expanded Detention Centers

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Land Use & Zoning
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
developers‑and‑builders regulated · direct · 90% confidence

This bill imposes an immediate moratorium on filing or processing applications to establish, expand, or change the use of private detention centers. This prevents developers from moving forward with these specific types of projects within Seattle.

license‑and‑permit‑holders regulated · direct · 70% confidence

The bill halts the acceptance and approval of land use applications for the establishment or expansion of private detention centers. This stops the issuance of permits for these facilities while the city updates its zoning regulations.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed an immediate moratorium on the establishment, expansion, or change of use for detention centers within Seattle. To achieve this, it sought to define "detention centers" and amend the Seattle Municipal Code to halt the filing and approval of related land use applications.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance establishes an immediate moratorium on the filing, processing, and approval of applications to establish, expand, or change the use of detention centers within Seattle. It specifically targets facilities operated by private entities that hold individuals pending legal proceedings, excluding those used for punishment, correction, or specific mental health and behavioral health detentions. The legislation amends the Seattle Municipal Code and approves a work plan to allow the city time to update its land use and zoning regulations regarding these facilities.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by City Clerk
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted March 10, 2026
Legislative journey
Mar 3 City Council Referred
Mar 10 City Council Passed
Mar 10 Mayor Signed
Mar 10 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Approving Claims Payments for February 23–27, 2026

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
employees‑in‑regulated‑sectors employed-by · direct · 90% confidence

This ordinance approves approximately $99 million for the City General Salary Fund to cover gross payroll for the week of February 23 through February 27, 2026.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay specific claims and bills incurred during the week of February 23 through February 27, 2026. Additionally, it sought to authorize those payments and formally ratify previous related actions.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the appropriation of funds to pay various city claims and payroll obligations for the week of February 23 through February 27, 2026. Specifically, it approves over $127 million for general claims and electronic financial transactions, as well as approximately $99 million for the City General Salary Fund to cover gross payroll. Finally, the bill ratifies and confirms prior acts related to these payments to ensure legal and financial consistency.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee Full Council
Transmitted March 10, 2026
Legislative journey
Mar 10 City Council Referred
Mar 10 City Council Passed
Mar 12 Mayor Signed
Mar 12 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Approving Claims Payments for February 16–20, 2026

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay specific claims and expenses incurred during the week of February 16 through February 20, 2026. Additionally, it sought to authorize those payments and formally ratify previous related actions.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the City of Seattle to pay various financial obligations incurred during the week of February 16, 2026, through February 20, 2026. It appropriates funds for mechanical warrants, e-payables, and electronic financial transactions (EFT), totaling over $120 million. These payments cover essential city expenses, including payroll and general bills processed through the PeopleSoft financial system. The legislation is required to ensure all expenditures remain consistent with the city's adopted budget and state law.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted March 3, 2026
Legislative journey
Mar 3 City Council Referred
Mar 3 City Council Passed
Mar 5 Mayor Signed
Mar 5 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Appropriating Funds for Claims: February 9–13, 2026

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
gig‑and‑contract‑workers funded · direct · 60% confidence

This ordinance authorizes the payment of approximately $45 million for general claims and transactions, which provides funding for these obligations.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay specific claims and bills incurred during the week of February 9 through February 13, 2026. Additionally, it sought to formally ratify and confirm certain prior official acts.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the City of Seattle to appropriate and pay approximately $117.4 million to cover various financial obligations for the week of February 9 through February 13, 2026. The funding is primarily split between general claims and transactions, totaling roughly $45 million, and gross payroll expenses, totaling approximately $71.9 million. By approving these payments, the City Council ensures the fulfillment of its payroll and operational commitments consistent with the current amended budget.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted February 24, 2026
Legislative journey
Feb 24 City Council Referred
Feb 24 City Council Passed
Feb 26 Mayor Signed
Feb 26 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Transferring Bitter Lake Reservoir Property for Street and Sidewalk Right-of-Way

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Transportation & Streets
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
pedestrians served · direct · 90% confidence

This bill transfers land to the Seattle Department of Transportation to be used specifically for sidewalk purposes along Linden Avenue North.

wheelchair‑and‑mobility‑device‑users served · direct · 80% confidence

This bill designates land for sidewalk purposes along Linden Avenue North, providing dedicated space for mobility devices.

drivers served · indirect · 60% confidence

This bill transfers land to the Seattle Department of Transportation to be used for street purposes along Linden Avenue North.

cyclists served · indirect · 50% confidence

This bill transfers land to the Seattle Department of Transportation to be used for street purposes along Linden Avenue North.

Population Density by District
Legally Recognized Populations
People with Disabilities People reporting serious difficulty in at least one of six Census domains: hearing, vision, cognitive, ambulatory, self-care, or independent living (ACS disability questions). Protected under the ADA / Section 504, not Title VI.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed transferring a portion of the Bitter Lake Reservoir property from Seattle Public Utilities to the Seattle Department of Transportation. The goal was to designate this land for street and sidewalk purposes and officially establish it as a public right-of-way.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance transfers jurisdiction of approximately 610 square feet of land from Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) to the Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT). The land, located at the Bitter Lake Reservoir site, is being designated for street and sidewalk purposes to support improvements along Linden Avenue North. This transfer is part of the broader Bitter Lake Reservoir Replacement Project, which aims to modernize the facility's water storage infrastructure.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted February 17, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
People With Disabilities
Legislative journey
Nov 19 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jan 20 City Council Referred
Feb 12 Governance and Utilities Committee Pass
Feb 17 City Council Passed
Feb 25 Mayor Signed
Feb 25 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Seattle Ordinance Restricting Information Sharing for Civil Immigration Enforcement

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Civil Rights & Anti-Discrimination
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
Population Density by District
Legally Recognized Populations
Racial or Ethnic Minorities People identifying as a race or ethnicity other than non-Hispanic White alone (Census race / Hispanic-origin categories, ACS Table B03002) — the population Title VI (race, color, national origin) protects.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed prohibiting the City of Seattle from providing nonpublicly available personal information to be used in the enforcement of civil immigration laws. It sought to clarify that immigration enforcement is a federal responsibility and updated the Seattle Municipal Code to reflect these restrictions.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance prohibits City of Seattle employees and officers from providing nonpublicly available personal information to be used in the enforcement of civil immigration laws. It formally clarifies the City's position that immigration enforcement is a federal matter and should not involve city resources or personnel unless required by law. By amending and adding sections to the Seattle Municipal Code, the bill aligns city policy with the Washington State "Keep Washington Working Act."

Origin of this policy

Introduced by City Clerk
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted February 17, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Racial Or Ethnic Minorities
Legislative journey
Feb 3 City Council Referred
Feb 10 Public Safety Committee Pass
Feb 17 City Council Passed
Feb 26 Mayor Signed
Feb 26 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Seattle Public Utilities to Join Regional Water Supply Forum for Tri-County Coordination

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Water, Sewer & Drainage
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
homeowners served · indirect · 60% confidence

By authorizing Seattle Public Utilities to collaborate with other regional suppliers on drinking water issues, this bill helps ensure the long-term water supply for residents.

renters served · indirect · 60% confidence

By authorizing Seattle Public Utilities to collaborate with other regional suppliers on drinking water issues, this bill helps ensure the long-term water supply for residents.

small‑business‑owners served · indirect · 60% confidence

By authorizing Seattle Public Utilities to collaborate with other regional suppliers on drinking water issues, this bill helps ensure the long-term water supply for residents.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed authorizing the General Manager and CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into an interlocal agreement to join the regional Water Supply Forum. The goal of this participation was to coordinate and collaborate on current and future drinking water supply issues across King, Snohomish, and Pierce counties.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the General Manager and CEO of Seattle Public Utilities to enter into an interlocal agreement to participate in the regional Water Supply Forum. This partnership allows Seattle to coordinate and collaborate with other water suppliers and local governments across King, Snohomish, and Pierce counties on current and future drinking water supply issues. By formalizing this relationship, the city aims to advance regional water resource projects and ensure effective governance among member utilities.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted February 17, 2026
Legislative journey
Jan 28 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Feb 10 City Council Referred
Feb 12 Governance and Utilities Committee Pass
Feb 17 City Council Passed
Feb 25 Mayor Signed
Feb 25 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance to Allow Limited Imazapyr Use for Invasive Knotweed Treatment

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Water, Sewer & Drainage
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Legally Recognized Populations
Populations Facing Environmental Harm Not a single Census variable — identified by layering ACS demographics over environmental-exposure data (pollution sources, air toxics, hazardous sites), the approach used by EPA's now-discontinued EJScreen and Washington's Environmental Health Disparities Map.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed amending the Secondary Use Policies of the Cedar River Municipal Watershed to allow for the limited use of the herbicide imazapyr. The specific purpose of this proposal was to treat and control invasive knotweed species within the watershed.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance amends the Cedar River Municipal Watershed's Secondary Use Policies to allow for the limited application of the herbicide imazapyr to treat invasive knotweed. The measure aims to control the spread of knotweed, which threatens water quality and displaces native vegetation, while minimizing ecological risks. Specifically, Seattle Public Utilities seeks to implement a six-year management cycle to maintain compliance with regulations and protect the watershed.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted February 17, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Populations Facing Environmental Harm
Legislative journey
Jan 28 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Feb 10 City Council Referred
Feb 12 Governance and Utilities Committee Pass
Feb 17 City Council Passed
Feb 25 Mayor Signed
Feb 25 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Appropriating Funds for Claims (Feb 2–6, 2026) and Ratifying Prior Acts

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay specific city claims for the week of February 2 through February 6, 2026. Additionally, it sought to authorize those payments and formally ratify previous related actions.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the City of Seattle to pay various claims and payroll obligations incurred during the week of February 2, 2026, through February 6, 2026. It appropriates funds for disbursement via mechanical warrants, e-payables, and electronic financial transactions (EFT). The total approved payments include approximately $16.6 million in warrants, $53,784.34 in e-payables, and over $105.8 million in EFTs.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted February 17, 2026
Legislative journey
Feb 17 City Council Referred
Feb 17 City Council Passed
Feb 25 Mayor Signed
Feb 25 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Revising Land Use, Environmental Review, and Cultural Preservation Requirements

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Land Use & Zoning
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
developers‑and‑builders regulated · direct · 90% confidence

This bill changes the environmental review thresholds and requirements for transportation, archaeological, and cultural resource preservation that these groups must follow during land use and zoning processes.

license‑and‑permit‑holders regulated · direct · 80% confidence

This bill revises the land use and zoning regulations and environmental review thresholds that apply to the permitting process.

drivers represented-by · indirect · 50% confidence

This bill modifies transportation-related requirements within the city's environmental review thresholds.

transit‑riders represented-by · indirect · 50% confidence

This bill modifies transportation-related requirements within the city's environmental review thresholds.

cyclists represented-by · indirect · 50% confidence

This bill modifies transportation-related requirements within the city's environmental review thresholds.

Population Density by District
Legally Recognized Populations
Tribal Members & Treaty Rights Holders Enrolled members of federally recognized tribes and holders of treaty-reserved rights — a legal/political status set by tribal governments and treaties, not a Census variable. Self-identified American Indian / Alaska Native race (ACS Table B02001) is the closest, imperfect proxy.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

Amendments

Member / Body Amendment Date
Land Use and Sustainability Committee pass as amended Feb 4, 2026

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed revisions to Seattle's land use and zoning laws, specifically focusing on updating environmental review thresholds. It aimed to modify requirements related to transportation, archaeological preservation, and the protection of cultural resources.

What The Final Text Does

Based on the provided title, this ordinance updates Seattle's land use and zoning laws by revising the thresholds that trigger environmental reviews. Specifically, it modifies requirements related to transportation, as well as the preservation of archaeological and cultural resources. To achieve this, the bill amends several sections of the Seattle Municipal Code, including Chapters 22, 23, and 25.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted February 10, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Tribal Members And Treaty Rights Holders
Legislative journey
Sep 10 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Oct 14 City Council Referred
Oct 31 Land Use Committee Discussed
Jan 6 City Council Re-referred
Feb 4 Land Use and Sustainability Committee Pass as amended
Feb 10 City Council Passed
Feb 18 Mayor Signed
Feb 18 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Updating Seattle Zoning and Transportation Impact and Management Requirements

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Land Use & Zoning
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
developers‑and‑builders regulated · direct · 90% confidence

This bill directly changes the requirements for transportation impact analyses, transportation management plans, and construction management plans that developers must follow during the development process.

license‑and‑permit‑holders regulated · direct · 70% confidence

This bill revises the land use and zoning regulations that govern the requirements for obtaining permits for housing and infill projects.

drivers served · indirect · 60% confidence

This bill updates transportation impact and management plans to align with the city's Comprehensive Plan for urban growth.

transit‑riders served · indirect · 60% confidence

This bill updates transportation impact and management plans to align with the city's Comprehensive Plan for urban growth.

cyclists served · indirect · 60% confidence

This bill updates transportation impact and management plans to align with the city's Comprehensive Plan for urban growth.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

Amendments

Member / Body Amendment Date
Land Use and Sustainability Committee pass as amended Feb 4, 2026

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed updates to Seattle's land use and zoning laws specifically regarding how transportation and construction are managed during development. It sought to revise the requirements for transportation impact analyses, transportation management plans, and construction management plans across multiple sections of the Seattle Municipal Code.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance updates Seattle's land use and zoning regulations to streamline the development process for housing and infill projects. Specifically, it revises the requirements for transportation impact analyses, transportation management plans, and construction management plans. These changes are intended to align city code with updated state laws and the city's new Comprehensive Plan to encourage more efficient urban growth.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted February 10, 2026
Legislative journey
Sep 18 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Dec 2 City Council Referred
Dec 3 Land Use Committee Discussed
Jan 6 City Council Re-referred
Feb 4 Land Use and Sustainability Committee Pass as amended
Feb 10 City Council Passed
Feb 18 Mayor Signed
Feb 18 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Establishing Social Housing Tax Fund and Interlocal Agreement with SSHD

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Housing & Tenancy
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
homeowners taxed · direct · 90% confidence

This bill implements the Social Housing Tax approved by voters, which creates a financial burden for those taxed.

renters served · indirect · 80% confidence

This bill establishes the Social Housing Tax Fund and the administrative framework to fund the Seattle Social Housing Developer.

people‑experiencing‑homelessness served · indirect · 70% confidence

This bill creates the Social Housing Tax Fund and the oversight procedures to support the Seattle Social Housing Developer.

developers‑and‑builders served · indirect · 60% confidence

This bill authorizes an agreement with the Seattle Social Housing Developer to manage the implementation and administration of social housing tax revenue.

Population Density by District
Legally Recognized Populations
Low-Income Populations People living below the federal poverty threshold, based on household income and family size (ACS Table S1701 / B17001).

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

Amendments

Member / Body Amendment Date
Finance, Native Communities, and Tribal Governments Committee pass as amended Feb 3, 2026

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed establishing a Social Housing Tax Fund and authorizing the Mayor to enter into an interlocal agreement with the Seattle Social Housing Developer. This agreement would define the procedures for managing, transferring, and overseeing the tax revenue, while ensuring the City is reimbursed for administrative costs and outstanding loans.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance establishes the framework for implementing and managing the Social Housing Tax approved by Seattle voters in February 2025. It authorizes the Mayor to enter into an interlocal agreement with the Seattle Social Housing Developer to determine how the tax is administered, reported, and transferred. Additionally, the bill creates a dedicated Social Housing Tax Fund and ensures the City is reimbursed for its administrative costs and outstanding loan balances.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted February 10, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Low Income Populations
Legislative journey
Dec 3 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jan 13 City Council Referred
Jan 20 Finance, Native Communities, and Tribal Governments Committee Discussed
Feb 3 Finance, Native Communities, and Tribal Governments Committee Pass as amended
Feb 10 City Council Passed
Feb 19 Mayor Signed
Feb 19 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Appropriating Funds for Claims: Jan 26–30, 2026

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
employees‑in‑regulated‑sectors employed-by · direct · 90% confidence

This ordinance approves $71.3 million to cover gross payroll expenses for the period ending January 27, 2026, ensuring the payment of city employee wages.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay specific claims and bills incurred during the week of January 26 through January 30, 2026. Additionally, it sought to authorize those payments and formally ratify previous related actions.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the City of Seattle to pay various claims and payroll expenses for the week of January 26 through January 30, 2026. It appropriates approximately $104.4 million to cover general claims, e-payables, and electronic financial transactions. Additionally, it approves $71.3 million for gross payroll expenses for the period ending January 27, 2026.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted February 10, 2026
Legislative journey
Feb 10 City Council Referred
Feb 10 City Council Passed
Feb 18 Mayor Signed
Feb 18 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Approving Claims Payment for January 19–23, 2026

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Absent
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay specific claims and bills incurred during the week of January 19 through January 23, 2026. Additionally, it sought to authorize those payments and formally ratify previous related actions.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the City of Seattle to pay various claims and expenditures incurred during the week of January 19, 2026, through January 23, 2026. The total approved amount is $76,123,771.36, which is distributed across electronic financial transactions, mechanical warrants, and e-payables. The bill ensures these payments are consistent with the current amended budget and adheres to state laws regarding expenditure allowances.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted February 3, 2026
Legislative journey
Feb 3 City Council Referred
Feb 3 City Council Passed
Feb 5 Mayor Signed
Feb 5 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Appropriating Funds for Claims: January 12–16, 2026

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
employees‑in‑regulated‑sectors employed-by · direct · 90% confidence

This ordinance allocates $70,630,557.00 to cover gross payroll for the period ending January 13, 2026.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay specific claims and bills incurred during the week of January 12, 2026, through January 16, 2026. Additionally, it sought to formally ratify and confirm certain prior official acts.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance authorizes the appropriation of funds to pay various city claims and payroll expenses for the week of January 12 through January 16, 2026. Specifically, it approves over $84 million for general claims, e-payables, and electronic financial transactions. Additionally, it allocates $70,630,557.00 to cover gross payroll for the period ending January 13, 2026.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted January 27, 2026
Legislative journey
Jan 27 City Council Referred
Jan 27 City Council Passed
Jan 28 Mayor Signed
Jan 28 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Granting 15-Year Pedestrian Skybridge Operating Permit to HST Lessee West Seattle LLC

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Transportation & Streets
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
license‑and‑permit‑holders regulated · direct · 90% confidence

This bill grants HST Lessee West Seattle LLC a permit to continue operating and maintaining a pedestrian skybridge for an initial 15-year term, with an option to renew for another 15 years.

pedestrians served · direct · 80% confidence

This bill ensures the continued operation of a pedestrian skybridge over Virginia Street between 5th and 6th Avenues.

drivers sited-near · indirect · 50% confidence

This bill allows a pedestrian skybridge to remain in place over Virginia Street between 5th and 6th Avenues.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

The bill proposed granting HST Lessee West Seattle LLC a permit to continue operating and maintaining a pedestrian skybridge over Virginia Street. The proposed agreement would have been for an initial 15-year term, with the option to renew for one additional 15-year term.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance grants HST Lessee West Seattle LLC permission to continue operating and maintaining a pedestrian skybridge located over Virginia Street, between 5th and 6th Avenues. The permit is granted for an initial 15-year term, with the option to renew for one additional 15-year term. The bill establishes the specific conditions under which this permission is granted and provides a framework for the acceptance of those terms.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted January 20, 2026
Legislative journey
Jun 4 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Jul 1 City Council Referred
Dec 2 Transportation Committee Discussed
Jan 6 City Council Re-referred
Jan 15 Transportation, Waterfront, and Seattle Center Committee Pass
Jan 20 City Council Passed
Jan 27 Mayor Signed
Jan 27 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Seattle to Vacate Denny Triangle Alley for New Development and Park Agreement

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Land Use & Zoning
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
developers‑and‑builders represented-by · direct · 90% confidence

The bill vacates a specific alley in the Denny Triangle neighborhood, granting the GID Development Group the land use requested in their petition.

petitioners‑and‑appellants represented-by · direct · 90% confidence

This ordinance grants the petition from GID Development Group and the Seattle Parks and Recreation Department to vacate a specific alley and accepts their Property Use and Development Agreement.

district‑7 represented-by · indirect · 60% confidence

The bill changes land use in the Denny Triangle neighborhood by vacating an alley and establishing a Property Use and Development Agreement for public-benefit obligations.

drivers sited-near · indirect · 50% confidence

The bill removes a specific alley from public use in the Denny Triangle neighborhood by vacating it.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed vacating a specific alley in the Denny Triangle neighborhood located within Block 24 of Heirs of Sarah A. Bell's Second Addition. It also sought to accept a Property Use and Development Agreement requested by the GID Development Group and the Seattle Parks and Recreation Department.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance vacates a specific alley located in Block 24 of the Heirs of Sarah A. Bell's Second Addition within the Denny Triangle neighborhood. The action is being taken following a petition submitted by the GID Development Group and the Seattle Parks and Recreation Department. Additionally, the bill formally accepts a Property Use and Development Agreement, which ensures the petitioners fulfill specific public-benefit obligations in exchange for the vacation.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted January 20, 2026
Legislative journey
Apr 23 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Nov 12 City Council Referred
Dec 2 Transportation Committee Discussed
Jan 6 City Council Re-referred
Jan 15 Transportation, Waterfront, and Seattle Center Committee Pass
Jan 20 City Council Passed
Jan 27 Mayor Signed
Jan 27 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Ordinance Appropriating Funds for Claims: January 5–9, 2026

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Budget & Appropriations
Resident-relevant
Administrative
Routine administrative action — claims settlement, appointment, or contract authorization — without direct resident impact.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed the appropriation of funds to pay specific claims and bills incurred during the week of January 5 through January 9, 2026. Additionally, it sought to formally ratify and confirm certain prior administrative acts.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance appropriates a total of $101,689,061.74 to pay various city claims and expenditures for the week of January 5 through January 9, 2026. The funding is divided between electronic financial transactions ($75.8 million), mechanical warrants ($25.7 million), and e-payables ($170,768.54). The bill ensures these payments are consistent with the current amended budget and confirms that no expenditures exceed authorized allowances.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Seattle City Council
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted January 20, 2026
Legislative journey
Jan 20 City Council Referred
Jan 20 City Council Passed
Jan 27 Mayor Signed
Jan 27 Mayor Returned

Ordinance Passed Approved by Full Council, in executive phase

Six-Month Extension of Interim Floodplain Regulations for Updated FEMA Rate Maps

Next step: Awaiting Mayor signature — Mayor’s Office

Policy Area
Land Use & Zoning
Resident-relevant
Yes
This bill is likely to directly affect residents and is worth your attention.
Can I still act?
Already Enacted
City Clerk
This bill has been signed into law.
Who’s affected & how
homeowners regulated · direct · 90% confidence

This bill extends interim regulations that allow homeowners to use updated National Flood Insurance Rate Maps to obtain flood insurance through FEMA.

developers‑and‑builders regulated · direct · 80% confidence

This bill extends interim regulations governing development in special flood hazard areas to ensure compliance with state and federal standards.

license‑and‑permit‑holders regulated · direct · 70% confidence

This bill extends interim regulations that govern development in special flood hazard areas.

landlords regulated · direct · 60% confidence

This bill extends interim regulations that allow property owners to use updated National Flood Insurance Rate Maps to secure flood insurance through FEMA.

Legally Recognized Populations
Populations Facing Environmental Harm Not a single Census variable — identified by layering ACS demographics over environmental-exposure data (pollution sources, air toxics, hazardous sites), the approach used by EPA's now-discontinued EJScreen and Washington's Environmental Health Disparities Map.

Votes

Council Member Seat Sponsored Amendment Final Vote
Rob Saka District 1 — Yes
Eddie Lin District 2 — Yes
Joy Hollingsworth District 3 — Yes
Maritza Rivera District 4 — Yes
Debora Juarez District 5 — Yes
Dan Strauss District 6 — Yes
Robert Kettle District 7 — Yes
Alexis Mercedes Rinck At Large — Yes
Dionne Foster At Large — Yes

What Was Originally Proposed

This ordinance proposed a sixth-month extension of interim floodplain regulations originally established by Ordinance 126113. The goal of the extension was to allow individuals to use updated National Flood Insurance Rate Maps to secure flood insurance through FEMA.

What The Final Text Does

This ordinance extends Seattle's interim floodplain development regulations for an additional six months, marking the tenth such extension since July 2020. These regulations govern development in special flood hazard areas to ensure compliance with standards set by the Washington State Department of Ecology and the National Flood Insurance Program. The extension is intended to allow residents to utilize updated National Flood Insurance Rate Maps to secure flood insurance through FEMA.

Origin of this policy

Introduced by Mayor's Office
Assigned committee City Clerk
Transmitted January 13, 2026
Communities this bill concerns
Populations Facing Environmental Harm
Legislative journey
Dec 3 Mayor Mayor's leg transmitted to Council
Dec 9 City Council Referred
Dec 17 Land Use Committee Pass
Jan 13 City Council Passed
Jan 20 Mayor Signed
Jan 20 Mayor Returned

Population density maps use the ACS 2023 5-Year Estimates (2019-2023), tables B01001, B02001, B03002, B11003, B11005, B13002, B16002, B17001, B18101, retrieved 2026-09-24. Council district boundaries: seattleio/seattle-boundaries-data (community-maintained, not an official City of Seattle GIS source). Aggregation methodology Census tract estimates apportioned to City Council districts by area-weighted overlay: each tract's counts are split across districts in proportion to the share of the tract's land area falling in each district, then summed per district. District boundaries: seattleio/seattle-boundaries-data (community-maintained, not an official City of Seattle GIS source). Tract boundaries: US Census Bureau TIGER/Line cartographic boundary files, 2023 vintage. Citywide figures are queried directly at the Seattle place level, not resummed from districts. ACS 5-year estimates carry sampling error that can be substantial at the tract level; treat percentages as estimates, not precise counts.